KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
 ·Cox HSI
 ·AT&T Southwest
| Too bad you can't throttle your payments
... I was writing out the check to pay for your services when I hit my bandwidth or cash spending limit and had to throttle your payment to $1.58 for the month.
Here's your $1.58, bill balance is paid in full. Enjoy...
Yeah.... wish it worked that way.
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) |
|
hottboiinnc
Kyle
join:2003-10-15
Toledo, OH | The sad way in many states it does. You can write your check out to a dollar amount in the memo section write "paid in full" and as long as the person cashes the check; that bill is paid in full. |
|
TK Junk Mail
Golf season has returned - hurrah
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Margate City, NJ
clubs:
·Comcast
| said by hottboiinnc  :The sad way in many states it does. You can write your check out to a dollar amount in the memo section write "paid in full" and as long as the person cashes the check; that bill is paid in full. And that also opens you up to charges of FRAUD - a criminal offense.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
RadioDoc
Sortofadog
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
Chicago, IL
·AT&T Midwest
| reply to hottboiinnc
What you write on the memo is irrelevant. I could write "TK is a Democrat" in the memo, send him a check for $100 and the only thing I would have accomplished is sending him a Franklin.
If you want to play the "paid in full" game it has to be on the back, in the endorsement area, and be fully spelled out. And you'd still lose because the game is rigged against you when automated payment processing equipment handles the check.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
Shark_615
join:2006-01-17
Pickering, ON | reply to hottboiinnc
MYTH |
|
Ebolla
join:2005-09-28
Dracut, MA | reply to hottboiinnc
»consumer-law.lawyers.com/Paid-in···emo.html |
|
nasadude
join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast
| reply to hottboiinnc
I am pretty sure I read about a case where someone actually won a court case doing this, but I think he complied with the restrictions below. He basically printed a short contract statement on the check and whoever he owed it to thought it was a joke, signed it and deposited it, then asked for the rest of his money. Went to court and the check writer won.
»www.snopes.com/business/bank/paidfull.asp
Section 3-311 of the Uniform Commercial Code does state that a debt can be discharged with a check designated as payment in full "if the person against whom the claim is asserted proves that the instrument or an accompanying written communication contained a conspicuous statement to the effect that the instrument was tendered as full satisfaction of the claim." However, it's up to the claimant to prove "that within a reasonable time before collection of the instrument was initiated, the claimant, or an agent of the claimant having direct responsibility with respect to the disputed obligation, knew that the instrument was tendered in full satisfaction of the claim." So if you receive a check marked "paid in full" made out for less than the amount you have agreed upon, you'd best not cross out the words "paid in full" or write "disputed" on it and cash it anyway, as you risk having the entire debt discharged. However, this condition does /not/ apply to "transactions conducted or performed, in whole or in part, by electronic means or electronic records, in which the acts or records of one or both parties are not reviewed by an individual in the ordinary course [of business]," which means that this scheme will not work at all for most bill or credit card payments, as those payments are typically handled by automated systems and not humans. |
|
Snickerdo
Premium
join:2001-02-28
St Catharines, ON
·Cogeco Cable
| reply to TK Junk Mail
said by TK Junk Mail :And that also opens you up to charges of FRAUD - a criminal offense. Care to cite some case law where someone was charged and convicted of a fraud-related offence for an action such as this?
--
I swear that I will faithfully and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen. |
|
johnlane
@swbell.net | reply to nasadude
That section may apply with the UCC applies, but the UCC doesn't apply in all situations in which case you have to use ordinary common law and contract law which varies in different places. |
|
ptrowski
Got Helix?
Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
clubs:
 ·ViaTalk
·AT&T DSL Service
| reply to TK Junk Mail
said by TK Junk Mail :said by hottboiinnc :The sad way in many states it does. You can write your check out to a dollar amount in the memo section write "paid in full" and as long as the person cashes the check; that bill is paid in full. And that also opens you up to charges of FRAUD - a criminal offense. You sir are 110% wrong. It's not fraud, it just doesn't work.
--
"A religious war is like children fighting over who has the strongest imaginary friend."
Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org |
|
Reece400
@rwoodbroadband.com | reply to KrK
Hehe, That's why bell forces you to use pre-authorized credit card or debit for payment  |
|
