<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Too close for comfort? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20224892</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:59:46 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:59:46 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Too close for comfort?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20225039</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1087080"><b>rawgerz</b></A> : That's what I meant. Who knows how many potential subscribers have a device polluting the 2.45Ghz range and up in their house with the range of baby monitors, cordless phones, cheap microwaves, bluetooth, routers, etc. available.<br><br>They won't do any homework and instead blame the technology and or provider for a localized problem.<br><small>--<br><i><br>You can't make all the people happy all of the time. But it should be common sense to shoot for the majority.</i></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20225039</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:49:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Too close for comfort?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20224892</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/853568"><b>rf_engineer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  rawgerz <A HREF="/useremail/u/1087080"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>2.5Ghz is a little too close to the ISM band (2.4Ghz) to me. Consumer devices don't always stay in spec and can bleed over to higher channels.<br>I wouldn't be surprised if something as simple as a microwave caused interference for someone using this equipment.<br><br>2.5 is still high as far as penetration is concerned. Maybe if they can implement high sensitivity radios (-90dBm) it would be worthwhile.<br> </div>-90dBm is very doable, it's all a matter of how many bits/second you're pumping through at what modulation.<br><br>On interference from 2.4 Ghz, I would think this interference would be very localized and would affect only the subscriber and not cause system-wide problems.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20224892</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:21:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Too close for comfort?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20223258</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1087080"><b>rawgerz</b></A> : 2.5Ghz is a little too close to the ISM band (2.4Ghz) to me. Consumer devices don't always stay in spec and can bleed over to higher channels.<br>I wouldn't be surprised if something as simple as a microwave caused interference for someone using this equipment.<br><br>2.5 is still high as far as penetration is concerned. Maybe if they can implement high sensitivity radios (-90dBm) it would be worthwhile.<br><small>--<br><i><br>You can't make all the people happy all of the time. But it should be common sense to shoot for the majority.</i></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20223258</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:50:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
