site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Ulmo

join:2005-09-22
San Jose, CA
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET

reply to RadioDoc

Re: This is the primary reason I have yet to go HD

said by RadioDoc:

The difference is in the implementation. Comcast is notoriously bad. The difference between OTA and Comcast HD in my area (I get all of the Chicago OTAs perfectly) is astounding. Comcast shouldn't be able to call their crappy over-compressed, erratic video "HD". On this system it looks worse than what my $79 upconverting DVD player puts out.
Finally some evidence about that. That means the ATSC-to-NTSC digital boxes will display crisp images to those old grannies on their old sets, and a few poor people too. Then when they get that "HD" service from Comcast, they'll be like, what, it's worse?!

And then there are the installers who "install" HD using composite or S-video connections because they forgot to bring the proper HD cables.
Comcast's HD literature gives detailed points about making sure your HD set is properly set up for HD through Comcast. They are very careful about omitting the correct connection from the DVR box (Comcast's solution for delivering HDTV) to the HD set (monitor).

Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

Over the Air is the best quality you will find period.

Even on DirecTV they constantly change the bit stream (compression) on their movies. I had a website book marked that showed you which channels are being delivered at what stream but lost it in a drive crash.



jeff17

join:2000-12-11
US

2 edits

My HD shows look good.


Tuesday, 29-May 20:01:31 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics