<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Good luck Rocky... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20227692</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:25:20 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:25:20 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Good luck Rocky...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20227692</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/500454"><b>Raptor</b></A> : At least it's getting some media attention.  Until now, Bell likely dismissed complaints as a few unhappy customers don't really have an effect.  This could certainly generate some attention, the kind of attention the big guys don't want.<br><br>Time and time again, overloaded nodes, severe throttling, received speeds not near advertised, etc are being given to customers that have no recourse.  We have either Rogers (cable) or Bell (DSL) to choose from essentially.  And at this point they're both offering the same degraded services.  Clearly Teksavvy and other indie ISPs are making money off non-degraded services, otherwise they wouldn't be in business.  Which suggests that this is just Rogers/Bell/etc looking to reap more profit per customer.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20227692</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:22:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Good luck Rocky...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20227624</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1173383"><b>ptrowski</b></A> : I know it will be a long uphill battle for you and could get nasty, but you havce alot of people here cheering you on.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20227624</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:08:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
