Underplay
join:2003-10-19
Tacoma, WA
| reply to cmarin
Re: Excellent
said by cmarin  :said by Underplay :This should help us fight back against the ISP's. This is turning into a real dirty game of chess. Insurgents using software instead of guns, fighting for our rights. hmmm... did they pass a new Ammendment while I was taking a dump? Last time I checked, broadband isn't a "right"... neither is stealing music and movies over P2P. Let's face it, a great deal of the piracy happens over P2P, no matter what other "legit" uses there are, this is the primary vehicle for theft. If Comcast resets the connection of some punk abuser thief so the rest of us can enjoy our speedy connections, so be it. I'm no Comcast fanboy, since my cable company was Adelphia for many years and only recently Comcast due to the bankruptcy settlement... but I have to say things have only improved since they've taken over. I pay less now than I did then, have dozens more TV channels, surf at twice the speed I had before, and it is generally more reliable than Adelphia ever was. Maybe you haven't heard the term, "get what you pay for". Simply put, we are all paying for our connection at the advertised speeds, and that is what we should be getting.
Maybe you are not familiar with azures fuze, its a bittorrent client with a built in media library, that lets users share videos, using there own bandwidth. It's actually pretty revolutionary.
You are trying to say that if i were to upload my own LEGAL video to this network, then my paid connection should be throttled just because it uses the bit torrent protocol, and SOME people use this protocol for piracy.
Maybe you have it shoveled into your head that Bittorrent and P2P is the evil devil, but you seriously need to rethink your opinion. Have you ever heard of rapidshare before? or how about FTP. These services can and ARE being used for illegal purposes just as commonly as bittorrent is. So why aren't the ISP's throttling these services?
Comcast is throttling bittorrent and uploading, NOT for piracy, NOT for you. But for themselves. Never before has the upstream been used for such a purpose and used so commonly, and its killing there network. So they are stopping all of us from using what we have paid for. So they can make some more bucks by not upgrading there infrastructure and forming to the wants of the people. |
|
TIGERON
join:2008-03-11
Pacifica, CA | THANK YOU!!! Finally there is somebody that has their head on the right way. |
|
Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
 ·Cox HSI
 ·Verizon FIOS
 ·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
 ·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP
3 edits | The traffic shaping has nothing to do with torrents or piracy.
It's about normalizing traffic shaping. The bigger picture is ISPs double dipping, charging for access to subscribers, enforced by traffic shaping content providers (particularly VOD competitors like iTunes rentals, Amazon unbox, Netflix VOD etc) into the ground who don't pay the bounty.
It's just easy for Comcast to start normalizing traffic shaping by crying piracy and upstream saturation. If they were actually interested in controlling bit torrent traffic, they could easily do that by enforcing "reasonable" upload caps. The upload caps would stop the 24/7 seeding that is saturating the upstream channels.
The next step for Comcast is to traffic shape streaming video, VOIP and other content competitors. |
|
dadkins
Can you do Blu?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
·Comcast
1 edit | I have Comcast's Blast service.
That's 16mbps/2mbps.
2mbps Upload(2.2mbps actual)
So, if I use VUZE to download MariposaHD(LEGAL), there is no way I can *give back* at least 1:1 because of the "traffic shaping" to save Comcast's poor network?
Uhm... what exactly is it that I am paying for again? 
Ya know, I can blast away all day and night slamming DVDs and even Blu-ray Discs to a friend or friends and that is going across the same freakin connection(@ 2.2mbps)... but no shaping! 
This is horseshit. No other way to classify it - straight horseshit! 
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera |
|
Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
1 edit | And your point is, sorry I'm missing it. |
|
dadkins
Can you do Blu?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
·Comcast
| said by Dogfather :And your point is? Downloading/sharing/uploading LEGAL items via BT protocol are getting hosed because of a blanket "Network Management" claim, but that same network can/will/is getting saturated via other means and this is ok and gets a free pass.
Horseshit!
I could send you a 4-25-50GB file right this second and max the crap out of my upload - for a while.
No BS Sandvine would be involved - would it?
Screw protocol... same network, same max speed.
Does this make sense?
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera |
|
Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA | Yep. |
|
ditka_b
Premium
join:2001-10-05
Barrington, IL | reply to Underplay
Bull lol |
|
