<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Gee, it wasn&#x27;t RFC non-compliance? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20229724</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:52:41 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:52:41 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Gee, it wasn&#x27;t RFC non-compliance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20229724</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : Back in high school?  Maybe their spring break is over.<br><br>That one guy was a real trip.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20229724</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:37:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Gee, it wasn&#x27;t RFC non-compliance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20228524</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/692322"><b>insomniac</b></A> : Where are the people who were screaming yesterday about how this was only occurring because of mail that wasn't RFC-compliant?<br><small>--<br>If everything seems to be going well, you've obviously overlooked something.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20228524</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:57:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
