<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>VISTA SP1. Symantec and device driver problems in Security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20232111</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:56:19 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:56:19 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>VISTA SP1. Symantec and device driver problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20232111</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/668609"><b>EGeezer</b></A> : Ah, nice not to be on the bleeding edge. One of my customers (a SBS/Symantec CE user) needed two new PCs, and I recommended XP Pro over Vista. Glad I did. In addition to requiring a server patch to get them to join the domain, we might have had to fight problems like these.<br><div class="bquote"><small>said by article :</small><br><br>Microsoft has configured Windows Update to prevent Vista users whose PCs contain certain device drivers from downloading Vista SP1 because these drivers were reportedly causing technical issues after SP1 was installed. These drivers included display drivers from Intel and a software driver for Symantec's Endpoint Protection 11.0 and Network Access Control products.<br></div>Article <A HREF="http://www.crn.com/software/206905371"><b>here,</b></a><br><br>Related article <A HREF="http://www.crn.com/software/206905723"><b>here.</b></a><br><br><small>--<br>Mayors of New York come from nowhere and go nowhere.<br>Wallace Sayre (apparently, so do governors... )</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20232111</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:35:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
