Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Tech and Talk » Technical » Digital Imaging » [FYI] Pshop Express
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1330
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
NASA pics »
« [Help] Questions on Legalities  
AuthorAll Replies


Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA
reply to SilverSurfer
Re: [FYI] Pshop Express

Thanks for pointing that out. I showed it to my wife and she's already alerted some of her friends who were telling other people about it.


Gemologist
Premium
join:2001-11-15
USA
clubs:

reply to SilverSurfer
said by Adobe :

Statement for Terms of Service Issues:
We've heard your concerns about the terms of service for Photoshop Express beta. We reviewed the terms in context of your comments - and we agree that it currently implies things we would never do with the content. Therefore, our legal team is making it a priority to post revised terms that are more appropriate for Photoshop Express users. We will alert you once we have posted new terms.

Thank you for your feedback on Photoshop Express beta and we appreciate your input.

-Adobe Photoshop Express Team


--
Images are Copyrighted and use is NOT
permitted.


No_Strings
Premium,Mod
join:2001-11-22
The OC
reply to X Man
Got it, thanks.

I haven't been considered cool since 1974, and even then there was some debate.


X Man
Sober
Premium
join:2005-09-05
USA

reply to No_Strings
said by No_Strings See Profile :

I get that part, but (and again, I'm only referencing the dpreview forum links - I have no idea if their posters are as intelligent and clued in as here ... how could they be? ). What I'm hearing is conflicted between:

1. Download and use this cool, free stuff and we own your soul in perpetuity.

2. Post an image to our site and we can use ut as we see fit.

Neither or either may be acceptable to some folks and I'm in no way trying to promote it. Just trying to grasp the scope.

Thanks.
It really makes no difference. The above quote from their TOS are 100% un-acceptable.The "scope" is all encompassing to content that's uploaded to "publicly accessible" areas of Adobe's site or sites. Forever. Period.

You up-load to edit. This is all web-based. That's the "cool" part.

Adobe has already caught hell for this story and claim they are working with their legal team to modify the TOS to make them more acceptable.

Regards,
Mike


MrBradTX

join:2001-05-23
Carrollton, TX
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to No_Strings
However, with respect to Your Content that you submit or make available for inclusion on publicly accessible areas of the Services,
My admittedly amateur reading of this suggests that if you upload images to a public album hosted by Adobe, that public means public.

It's less clear whether using PSExpress to manipulate an image constitutes submitting to a publicly accessible area.


No_Strings
Premium,Mod
join:2001-11-22
The OC

Host:
Wireless Networking
All Things Unix
Cox HSI
Qwest
Efficient
reply to X Man
I get that part, but (and again, I'm only referencing the dpreview forum links - I have no idea if their posters are as intelligent and clued in as here ... how could they be? ). What I'm hearing is conflicted between:

1. Download and use this cool, free stuff and we own your soul in perpetuity.

2. Post an image to our site and we can use ut as we see fit.

Neither or either may be acceptable to some folks and I'm in no way trying to promote it. Just trying to grasp the scope.

Thanks.


X Man
Sober
Premium
join:2005-09-05
USA

reply to No_Strings
It's pretty clear. They can & will do whatever they'd like with the images, and there's nothing you can do about it.
said by El Diablo aka: Adobe :

8. Use of Your Content.

1. Adobe does not claim ownership of Your Content. However, with respect to Your Content that you submit or make available for inclusion on publicly accessible areas of the Services, you grant Adobe a worldwide, royalty-free, nonexclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, and fully sublicensable license to use, distribute, derive revenue or other remuneration from, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, publicly perform and publicly display such Content (in whole or in part) and to incorporate such Content into other Materials or works in any format or medium now known or later developed.
You didn't think they were offering up this "free" service out of the goodness of their hearts, did you?

Regards,
Mike


No_Strings
Premium,Mod
join:2001-11-22
The OC
reply to HotRodFoto
The dpreview forum link shows quite a diverse set of opinions on just how far Adobe can go. Anyone here care to opine on the terms?


Gemologist
Premium
join:2001-11-15
USA
clubs:

reply to HotRodFoto
said by HotRodFoto See Profile :

STAY AWAY!!!!
»forums.dpreview.com/forums/readf···27333744
Unless u want to let Adobe sell, reuse, publish, redistribute your images!
Nice catch!!! Yest another Company suckering folks into giving them their images for trinkets. Very very pathetic on Adobe's part!!! To think I was going to buy LR and CS3, I think I will refrain for now. CS2 will hold me for a whole, maybe permanently if they keep this garbage up! Guess they needed more stock pictures for their Adobe Stock thing to sell Companies and such. Wow, geeessshhh, couldn't do it the right way and just pay the photogs for their hard work... nah.. no way... easier to steal it from the unknowing masses who will flock to use something free, lol. No wonder this Countries' economy is going in the sh*tter so quickly!
--
Images are Copyrighted and use is NOT
permitted.


HotRodFoto
Premium
join:2003-04-19
Denver, CO

reply to SilverSurfer
STAY AWAY!!!!
»forums.dpreview.com/forums/readf···27333744
Unless u want to let Adobe sell, reuse, publish, redistribute your images!
--
Capturing the images of Colorado
»jdebordphoto.com


tmpchaos
Requiescat in pace
Premium,Mod
join:2000-04-28
Hoboken, NJ
clubs:
reply to SilverSurfer
»Free Photoshop on the Web

SilverSurfer

join:2007-08-19
now free.
Forums » Tech and Talk » Technical » Digital ImagingNASA pics »
« [Help] Questions on Legalities  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 10:20:46 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [197] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [62] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [56] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [22] AT&T Launching New 23 Mbps U-Verse Tier
Most people now reading
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· HOA Headaches [General Questions]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]
· buffs, nerfs, and 3.3 [World of Warcraft]
· Woo hoo for snow! [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Buzzing whatchamacallit in ceiling...?? Help identify. [Home Repair & Improvement]