Blue Turtle
@telus.net
| How to Sanitize the Internets from the Kidz Peeping.
I propose a radical new idea.
It will sanitize the internets.
Note the ip of the kids parents.
Give it to a internet establishment.
All the websites that get it can ip ban these people unless they apply legally to view it.
Also, if they kids use a different pc, the websites can monitor if it's behavior of kids from cookies, and decide to ip ban them or not using this or similar methods.
Furthermore. The parents who have their kids probing these sites can have their ip flagged, and the website can contact the parents isp and they can email or send a letter showing when the kids probed.
Otherwise it's not gonna work. |
|
CylonRed
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-06
Bloom County | Riiiiiight - you get working on that and tell us how it goes ok? |
|
clowny
Premium
join:2003-09-09
Crystal Lake, IL
clubs: | reply to Blue Turtle
Huh? |
|
swhx7
Premium
join:2006-07-23
Elbonia
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to Blue Turtle
Let's examine this idea.
1. Parents who want "sanitized" internet sign up with ISP to get their IPs put on a list.
* IPs change with DHCP, this would take some continuing work on the part of the ISP.
2. Some organization collects all the lists and gives them out to websites that the parents want kids not to see.
* Are all these parents going to agree on what websites they want to keep kids away from?
3. The websites drop requests from IPs on the lists.
* How are they going to get all these various websites, operated by many different organizations in many different places, to comply with this continual tinkering of their access lists?
* It would be easier for the ISP to offer the customer some sort of "pre-filtered" connection, with the ISP doing the work and using a commercial service to put sites on the list. But this isn't a radical new idea; it's already been done.
* Clever teenagers looking for sex sites will easily get around any restrictions. |
|
dave
Premium,MVM
join:2000-05-04
not in ohio | reply to Blue Turtle
Does your mother know you're writing things like that? |
|
Blue Turtle
@telus.net
| reply to Blue Turtle
Dave, I expect better from you. Looks to me like you've changed, or maybe you were always like this. I'm disappointed in you. How much do they pay you for your pc work and your here doing stuff like that. Really now.  |
|
skyroket
join:2001-06-11
Colorado, US | said by Blue Turtle :and your here doing stuff like that. Really now. you're? |
|
Name Game
Premium
join:2002-07-07
North Myrtle Beach, SC
edit:
March 27th, @05:35PM
| reply to Blue Turtle
said by Blue Turtle :Dave, I expect better from you. Looks to me like you've changed, or maybe you were always like this. I'm disappointed in you. How much do they pay you for your pc work and your here doing stuff like that. Really now. Don't worry..I read all his email when he is sleeping and make sure his cookies are sugar free.
--
Gladiator Security Forum »www.gladiator-antivirus.com/
Missing Kids
»www.missingkids.com/ |
|
exocet_cm
Signal 26's Rock
Premium
join:2003-03-23
New Orleans, LA
clubs: 
·Cox HSI
 ·Network Telephone ..
·Suddenlink
 ·Cingular Wireless
·AT&T Southeast
| reply to Blue Turtle
said by Blue Turtle :Dave, I expect better from you. Looks to me like you've changed, or maybe you were always like this. I'm disappointed in you. How much do they pay you for your pc work and your here doing stuff like that. Really now. I agree with dave  . It seems as if your parents didn't sanitize your interwebs before you began to surf the tubes.
--
"I have measured out my life with coffee spoons..." - T.S Eliot
Check Out the Tech Bench »johndball.blaize.net/index.php/tech-bench/
Ma blog: »www.johndball.com |
|
rob_in_chatt
Premium
join:2004-09-17
Chattanooga, TN | reply to Blue Turtle
the best way IMHO was the idea that all porn sites get shifted to the .xxx domain. that would have been the most simple solution to a growing problem. block the xxx domain and your set.
in a perfect world...................... |
|
caffeinator
Coming soon to a cup near you..
Premium
join:2005-01-16
Spokane, WA
·WebBand
| reply to Blue Turtle
said by Blue Turtle :
I propose a radical new idea.
It will sanitize the internets.
Ah, I get it now...
|
|
La Luna
Surviving Ashraful
Premium
join:2001-07-12
Hewitt, NJ
clubs:
·Optimum Online
 ·Vonage
| reply to Blue Turtle
An even better idea is for the parents to pay attention to what their kids are doing instead of hoping to rely on some non existent, impossible to implement net nanny technical nightmare that the ISP's will have absolutely no interest in bogging themselves down with (ie, being the parent FOR the parents). |
|
tomj1225
Premium
join:2001-12-17
Allentown, PA | reply to Blue Turtle
Yeah really how about you sanitize YOUR internet, and leave mine the f alone. Or better yet, why not try being a parent and watch what your kids are doing. |
|
EGeezer
Spring is here
Premium
join:2002-08-04
Central Ohio
clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable
·AT&T CallVantage
edit:
March 27th, @08:47PM
| reply to Blue Turtle
Let me know your responses from p0rnz.ru when you ask them to kindly submit to IP blacklisting, and what the process is for ISPs verifying who has kids and how the ISPs will enforce "legal requirements", and how the ISP determines the age of the PC user who's online.
Looks like i picked the wrong week ... |
|
i1me2ao
join:2001-03-03
TEXAS | reply to Blue Turtle
beat the horse again. all we need to do is all porn will be at .xxx education at edu etc etc.
--
»www.thereligionofpeace.com/ |
|
exocet_cm
Signal 26's Rock
Premium
join:2003-03-23
New Orleans, LA
clubs:
·Cox HSI
·Network Telephone ..
·Suddenlink
·Cingular Wireless
·AT&T Southeast
| reply to Blue Turtle
From the front page of BBR.
Teh intertubes cannot be sanitized for les enfants:
»www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/···sed-kids |
|
snowguynotlogin
@verizon.net
 from:
jaykaykay
| reply to Blue Turtle
Blue Turtle
no doubt you ment well by posting your suggestion..or at least I hope you did.
However, ISP's don't raise kids....parents raise kids. |
|
ULTRACOOLDAVE
@verizon.net
| reply to Blue Turtle
Kids under 18 should not have internet access at all, it is far too dangerious and parents who do not realize this should not be bringing up children, there needs to be a seperate PG rated internet for children that is completely and constantly monitored with no privacy at all. Cars, toilets and lockers in schools need to have any "right" to privacy eliminated- children need protection from themselves and others and privacy or internet is not in this equation. |
|
Indymike
join:2004-12-06
Indianapolis, IN
·Covad Communications
| reply to Blue Turtle
I have a better idea; how about parents turn on the parental filters built in to IE for a loooong time and simply plug in the web-sites that they have already verified as being okay for their kids?
I mean, c'mon, would a modicum of knowledge kill some people?
And to secure it, have the kiddies run in limited mode.....sheeeeeesh!
Please tell me where it is written that the world must be safe enough for children? Putting your kid on the internet by themselves, with no supervision is like dropping them off at an alley-way in New York City at 3 a.m. and saying "Play nicely till I return".
And finally, I have this great product that only appeals to kids, let me rent your address of "child" IPs so I can mass market to them, Please, Please, Please? |
|
ultracooldave
@verizon.net
| reply to Blue Turtle
Parents cannot be trusted to protect their children, none believes that "their child" could be a problem, the government has a duty to protect children and this means no internet, no privacy, no unrecorded chat rooms/e-mail, no unrecorded cell phone, no hiding drugs/weapons in school-do you have any idea how many children are simply vanishing? Children need to be protected from themselves, their ignorant/lazy parents and the limitless number of perverts attacking them! Until they are 18 they should have no right to any type of privacy. |
|
