www.broadbandreports.com
  
Search:  

 
   AllHot TopicsCable SupportTelco SupportHardware etcSecurityClubsGallery»»






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC Boss Not So Impressed With Comcast News » now
 
Search Topic:
  Social:
topic feed
 toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Martin - get aclue »
« How about?  
AuthorAll Replies

zed260

join:2007-09-30
Cleveland, TN
reply to RadioDoc
Re: now

in my opinion id rather pay 300 dollors a month for an honest internet provider then a penny for a dishonest one


Skeedatl
To Provoke and Annoy
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
For a penny, I'll take the dishonest one, but $46-$56? No way.

LeftOfSanity

join:2005-11-06
Felton, DE


edit:
March 28th, @08:03AM

reply to zed260
said by zed260 See Profile :

in my opinion id rather pay 300 dollors a month for an honest internet provider then a penny for a dishonest one
Said the pirate. lol

Edit: Not saying you are personally, just thought that was funny.

VariableARK

join:2003-03-17
USA

reply to zed260
agreed, if you don't like comcasts practices, go to another provider, there are plenty of providers out there that DONT block traffic, or that are honest. Vote with your dollars, thats how capitalism is supposed to work, not with constant government intervention.


King P
Don't blame me. I voted for Ron Paul
Premium
join:2004-11-17
Inman, SC
especially when comcast is one of your TWO choices for internet providers, with the other being AT&T. Yep capitalism at it's finest right here...

VariableARK

join:2003-03-17
USA

I nearly guarantee that there are other smaller providers in your area, you just need to look. And on the very off chance that there isn't, if you care enough and there is a market for it, start your own ISP. Simple, capitalism is a self-regulating system; a Ron Paul voter should know that


funchords
Robb
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Hillsboro, OR
·Verizon Online DSL
·Comcast


edit:
March 28th, @02:54PM

said by VariableARK See Profile :

I nearly guarantee that there are other smaller providers in your area,
the FCC killed that possibility in 2005.

While you're right that nothing prevents new companies from joining the fray, any new carrier has to lay its own redundant infrastructure, tearing up the rights-of-ways just to place their fiber on top of Verizon's fiber, or their copper along side of AT&T's copper, or their coaxial cable atop Comcast's.

And after they're done tearing up the town, let's watch the companies fight it out as they blame each other for cutting wires or interfering with signals on wet crossed lines.

Dumb way to go -- there are plenty of rich people who could be investors, but there's not a lot of dumb rich people who would invest in such a perilous venture.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
FCC Public Hearing on the Future of the Internet - Thursday, April 17th - Stanford Univ., Calif.
Forums » FCC Boss Not So Impressed With Comcast NewsMartin - get aclue »
« How about?  

Most commented news this week
· [114] AOL Raises Dial-Up Prices
· [110] Time Warner Cable: Caps 'Make Your Internet Experience Better'
· [103] SMS: You're Paying $1,310 (Or More) Per Megabyte
· [89] July Fourth Open Thread
· [87] Canadian iPhone: Get Less, Pay More
· [83] Obama Addresses FISA Immunity Critics
· [81] How Much Bandwidth Do We Really Need?
· [78] Additional AT&T iPhone Pricing Details
· [75] AT&T, CT Settle Dispute Over 'Lawn Fridges'
· [71] Bono Blames ISPs For Music Industry Decline
Friday, 04-Jul
17:44:04
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
8th year online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF