<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;verizon/fairpoint&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/verizonfairpoint-20248844</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:52:23 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:52:23 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: verizon/fairpoint</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-verizonfairpoint-20251447</link>
<description><![CDATA[bicker posted : However, that's just the issue: The rest of New England provides Verizon enough of a financial advantage to offer service.  The folks in Northern New England simply aren't willing to pay a high enough premium to make doing business there worthwhile.  Folks there can rail against that reality all they wish, but if it were not true, then Verizon wouldn't be letting their assets there go.  The problem here is simply a <b>lack of profit</b>, nothing else.  The choice is clear: Provide a business environment where suppliers can earn more profit, or accept that you're fostering a business environment where customers will get incredibly poor (or no) service.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-verizonfairpoint-20251447</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 08:38:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>verizon/fairpoint</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/verizonfairpoint-20248844</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : excuse the verbage but f**k Verizon they have not cared for the customers for a long time. let i happen i plan as well as many others to cancel all of their provided services New England wide SCREW THEM]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/verizonfairpoint-20248844</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 17:35:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

