Siryak
join:2005-11-26
 ·WildBlue
| reply to jc100
Re: BS!!!
said by jc100  :Either way, satellite is a good backup, but nothing else. No it is good for downloading!...Oh wait you get FAPped for that...Well it is good for browsing....Oh wait thats slow....umm...I got a mousepad with it...
--
Wildblue(unfortunately) Pro Pack / Beam 40 / Laredo NOC / Windows Vista Home Premium |
|
jc100
join:2002-04-10
| reply to Siryak
I had verizon DSL when I first started. Boy, you talk about latency issues! I know the feeling. It wasn't far off from you. Talk about taking ten years to do anything. My 768/128 was more like 200/128!! Best yet,it took ten years to browse as my latency was crap. While this was DSL, and you are satellite, the dissatisfaction was no different. Either way, satellite is a good backup, but nothing else. |
|
trparky
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Premium,MVM
join:2000-05-24
Cleveland, OH
clubs: | reply to patcat88
You forgot your sarcasm tags there. LOL
--
Tom |
|
Siryak
join:2005-11-26
·WildBlue
| reply to nasadude
said by nasadude :said by Siryak :.. Ping statistics for 64.233.167.99: Packets: Sent = 5, Received = 5, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 1188ms, Maximum = 3506ms, Average = 1935ms OUCH! Yah...try doing ANYTHING interactive on that. With satellite something as simple as logging into an HTTPS website becomes a painful experience.
--
Wildblue(unfortunately) Pro Pack / Beam 40 / Laredo NOC / Windows Vista Home Premium |
|
nasadude
join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
 ·Comcast
| reply to Siryak
said by Siryak :.. Ping statistics for 64.233.167.99: Packets: Sent = 5, Received = 5, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 1188ms, Maximum = 3506ms, Average = 1935ms OUCH! |
|
cscottm
join:2002-05-09
Kent, WA | reply to Siryak
Ok your all right, I totally forgot about the latency. |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
1 edit | reply to cscottm
BUUUUTTT!!!! Satellite is 100% coverage. Isn't that great? FCC should ban DSL and cable internet. Satellite rocks my socks!
And dialup gives you better latency and a real connection you can use 24/7  |
|
Siryak
join:2005-11-26
·WildBlue
1 edit | reply to cscottm
said by cscottm :I agree unless that FAP thing didn't exist. Also people don't want to have to pay $80 (or whatever the price is now) for Satellite IMO it will still be utter and complete crap because of the latency.
Pinging google.com [64.233.167.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1930ms TTL=232
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=3506ms TTL=232
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1427ms TTL=232
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1626ms TTL=232
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1188ms TTL=232
Ping statistics for 64.233.167.99:
Packets: Sent = 5, Received = 5, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1188ms, Maximum = 3506ms, Average = 1935ms |
|
Jafo232
You Can't Spell Democrat Without Rat.
Premium
join:2002-10-17
Boonville, NY
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to Siryak
Agreed.. Deployment of broadband would suffer in every area if they had to pay the costs of getting satellite access like rural users do. Not to mention that lousy satellite service.
--
Custom PHP/Perl Development. Vbulletin And Wordpress Mods Too! |
|
cscottm
join:2002-05-09
Kent, WA
 ·Qwest.net
| reply to Siryak
I agree unless that FAP thing didn't exist. Also people don't want to have to pay $80 (or whatever the price is now) for Satellite
said by Siryak :I STRONGLY beg to differ!!! "broadband deployment is active, vibrant and successful." Wrong again! Sorry but Satellite is a piss poor excuse for successful broadband deployment. |
|
Siryak
join:2005-11-26
·WildBlue
| I STRONGLY beg to differ!!! "broadband deployment is active, vibrant and successful." Wrong again! Sorry but Satellite is a piss poor excuse for successful broadband deployment.
--
Wildblue Pro Pack / Beam 40 / Laredo NOC / Windows Vista Home Premium |
|
