cscottm
join:2002-05-09
Kent, WA
 ·Qwest.net
| Re: BS!!! I agree unless that FAP thing didn't exist. Also people don't want to have to pay $80 (or whatever the price is now) for Satellite
said by Siryak  :I STRONGLY beg to differ!!! "broadband deployment is active, vibrant and successful." Wrong again! Sorry but Satellite is a piss poor excuse for successful broadband deployment. | |
|
 
Siryak
join:2005-11-26
 ·WildBlue
1 edit | Re: BS!!! said by cscottm :I agree unless that FAP thing didn't exist. Also people don't want to have to pay $80 (or whatever the price is now) for Satellite IMO it will still be utter and complete crap because of the latency.
Pinging google.com [64.233.167.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1930ms TTL=232
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=3506ms TTL=232
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1427ms TTL=232
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1626ms TTL=232
Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1188ms TTL=232
Ping statistics for 64.233.167.99:
Packets: Sent = 5, Received = 5, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1188ms, Maximum = 3506ms, Average = 1935ms | |
|
 | nasadude
join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
 ·Comcast
| Re: BS!!! said by Siryak :.. Ping statistics for 64.233.167.99: Packets: Sent = 5, Received = 5, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 1188ms, Maximum = 3506ms, Average = 1935ms OUCH! | |
|
| |
Siryak
join:2005-11-26
·WildBlue
| Re: BS!!! said by nasadude :said by Siryak :.. Ping statistics for 64.233.167.99: Packets: Sent = 5, Received = 5, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 1188ms, Maximum = 3506ms, Average = 1935ms OUCH! Yah...try doing ANYTHING interactive on that. With satellite something as simple as logging into an HTTPS website becomes a painful experience.
--
Wildblue(unfortunately) Pro Pack / Beam 40 / Laredo NOC / Windows Vista Home Premium | |
|
| | | jc100
join:2002-04-10
| Re: BS!!! I had verizon DSL when I first started. Boy, you talk about latency issues! I know the feeling. It wasn't far off from you. Talk about taking ten years to do anything. My 768/128 was more like 200/128!! Best yet,it took ten years to browse as my latency was crap. While this was DSL, and you are satellite, the dissatisfaction was no different. Either way, satellite is a good backup, but nothing else. | |
|
| | | |
Siryak
join:2005-11-26
·WildBlue
| Re: BS!!! said by jc100 :Either way, satellite is a good backup, but nothing else. No it is good for downloading!...Oh wait you get FAPped for that...Well it is good for browsing....Oh wait thats slow....umm...I got a mousepad with it...
--
Wildblue(unfortunately) Pro Pack / Beam 40 / Laredo NOC / Windows Vista Home Premium | |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
1 edit | BUUUUTTT!!!! Satellite is 100% coverage. Isn't that great? FCC should ban DSL and cable internet. Satellite rocks my socks!
And dialup gives you better latency and a real connection you can use 24/7  | |
|
| 
trparky
Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
Premium,MVM
join:2000-05-24
Cleveland, OH
clubs: | Re: BS!!! You forgot your sarcasm tags there. LOL
--
Tom | |
|
|
|
|
