<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Ridiculous in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20264412</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:58:27 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:58:27 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20265849</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1492838"><b>ja2007123</b></A> : i think apple owns the blog site. too many apple related articles even the worthless article from Apple is longer than any microsoft related artice. Like that time, Vista SP1 was announced, they only post one short article and another diffrent article demonstrating the iphone sdk.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20265849</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:11:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20265711</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1479210"><b>SilverSurfer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  chlen <A HREF="/useremail/u/288149"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>BTW this is part of my master's thesis. <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://building.dow.com/styrofoam/what.htm" >building.dow.com/styrofoam/what.htm</A><br><br> </div>Congratulations. You're writing a thesis. No one in the entire history of the world before you has <b>ever</b> written one, so I can see why you would want to announce it.  <br><br>Secondly, there is far too much case law on the matter to debate this on an intellectual/informed level with you. So let's just call it a day and conclude how very <i>smartified</i> you are since you are, after all, writing a thesis.  (shock. gasp.) ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20265711</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:45:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20265405</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1514516"><b>Dogfather</b></A> : If not an April Fool's joke, this one will certainly be interesting.  Engaget obviously isn't selling the same product but the color could conceivably (in the twisted minds of lawyers) confuse people into thinking that T-Mobile somehow owns, contributes or endorses the site.<br><br>But in the states, I don't think T-Mobile has the color recognition of Dow Corning Pink insulation (that actually has commercials based on the color) or Cingular had with their ugly orange.  Ask 100 people what color a coke can is then ask 100 people what color the T in T-Mobile is.<br><br>Also if you look at their branding history (eg on the internet way back machine) the shade of magenta they use has changed over the last few years, none being like the shade used by Engadget.  &raquo;<A HREF="http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.tmobile.com" >web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.tmobile.com</A>  hardly establishing the same brand identity of Coca-Cola or Owen-Corning's pink insulation.<br><br>On the flip side, T-Mobile can just end up making a bunch of influential nerds angry and more inclined to write neg article after neg article about T-Mobile.  Is it really worth pissing off a lot of people to protect a portion of the trademark that may not even be enforceable.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20265405</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:53:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20264647</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : can they counter sue for "stupidty"?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20264647</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:42:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20264868</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/288149"><b>chlen</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  SilverSurfer <A HREF="/useremail/u/1479210"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Colors that are in general use are <b>not</b> trademarkable.  Somebody better wake up the T Mobile's legal dpt.<br> </div>Colors are, in fact even insulation cannot be shades of pink and blue unless it is made by Dow chemical.<br><br>Coke owns the Red shade on the bottle.<br><br>Colors are trade-marketable and carry the market area and 3 year active use policy as do all trade marks.<br><br>BTW this is part of my master's thesis. <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://building.dow.com/styrofoam/what.htm" >building.dow.com/styrofoam/what.htm</A><br><br>here is an example of Dow's blue trade mark.<br>&reg;&#153;* Trademark of The Dow Chemical Company ("Dow") or an affiliated company of Dow<br>**The color Blue is a Trademark of The Dow Chemical Company<br><br>Don't speak if you don't know. <br><br>edit - mistype<br><small>--<br>"He who is not afraid today to say 'no' to the repressive machinery of a criminal bureaucracy earns the right to be called a Human Being."<br>&#9;&raquo;<A HREF="http://lp.org/" >lp.org/</A><br><b>Zion is our milk</b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20264868</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:40:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20264721</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1039245"><b>firewire9999</b></A> : Well it making some see RED.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20264721</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:19:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20264450</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><b>Karl Bode</b></A> : I think they are trademark-able (at least in Germany, where they accomplished this), but I believe it only applies as brand infringement when we're talking about a competing provider:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080331/134624706.shtml" >www.techdirt.com/articles/200803&middot;&middot;&middot;06.shtml</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20264450</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:42:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20264412</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1479210"><b>SilverSurfer</b></A> : Colors that are in general use are <b>not</b> trademarkable.  Somebody better wake up the T Mobile's legal dpt.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20264412</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:36:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
