<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Bandwidth Alllocation&#x27; in forum &#x27;Rogers&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20075994</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:51:23 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:51:23 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20267195</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by newuser1 :</small><br><br>I don't know why they would say you could download 15 high def movies a month...if I was a new user I would look at that and be like, only 15.  They should have kept it at regular def and then they could say 50 or more.  That seems more impressive. I'm actually surprised they didn't say something stupid like 2 Million 3-second mpg clips.<br> </div>I'm told I can download and watch 24 HD movies per month with my 95GB cap. Aren't the average HD movies at least 30GB each or 50Gb if Blu-Ray? 95GB/24 = 3.95, not even a full SD movie.<br><br>Man, Rogers just go from bad to worse!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20267195</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:58:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20264750</link>
<description><![CDATA[golucky posted : The Extreme plan currently allows 100GB per month (combined upload and download) which now become only 95GB.  Why the clawback of 5GB?  That's effectively increasing the price by $7.50 per month (5GB times $1.50/GB usage charge) which is currently included in the monthly allowance.<br><br>Rogers increase the price a while ago then increases the download speed to 10 Mbps and finally takes back 5GB.<br><br>What their rationale other than nickeling and diming us like the banks are doing to us?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20264750</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:24:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20260785</link>
<description><![CDATA[sbrook posted : If they were to actually implement a "rollover" or rebate scheme, the caps would probably be well below half of the current values.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20260785</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:58:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20260732</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Will Rogers be crediting accounts for users who go under their allocated bandwidth? If not, WHY?  If someone is out of town for most of the month and only use 20% of their bandwidth aren't they entitled to a credit? Clearly Roger's billing system is now equipped for this. It seems like a glaring double standard to me. If Rogers wants to enforce a "price per GB" model they should be willing to offer it to light and heavy users equally. Even telephone companies are now offering roll-over minutes to customers. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20260732</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:51:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20259321</link>
<description><![CDATA[VelcomMatt posted : Hello a6why,<br><br>First I would like to say thank you for taking an interest in Velcom.  I was doing a search for Velcom today since there are various topics about our Company in different threads and came across this one.  <br><br>That's right the first three months for the high speed would be $28.95/mo+GST and then the regular pricing of $34.95/mo would apply.  There is no contract required to receive the promotional pricing.<br><br>In addition, one way to look at the speed decrease is with a 5Mbps connection and no cap you would be able to use more traffic Vs a 7Mbps connection but capped.<br><br>Should you have any other questions concerning our service please feel free to contact me via pm or send an e-mail to sales @ Velcom dot ca.  Hopefully this post is not considered as advertising or hijacking of the thread however I am just answering a potential customers question about our service.<br><br>As for newsgroup access I've heard rumors that some people were noticing a speed decrease nonetheless many reporting they have not.<br><br>Regards,<br><br>Matthew L.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20259321</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:20:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20249052</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : throttling will continue along with the caps and price increases.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20249052</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:19:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20241055</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I wouldn't expect anyone to be pleased.   The reason Im tracking my own and comparing to theirs is to see how accurate they are.  I've always tracked mine for a lot of reasons. 1. i have a wireless router that is locked but i still want to know if anyone has hacked the key. 2. two computers in the house, mine and my gf's. 3. Now im tracking to check rogers tracker.<br><br>I'm finding it flawed in a good way.   its under tracking by a gigs.  I think because they round down to the nearest gig.  Just last month it went a week without updating on the web site and then updated all the missing days on the 8th day.<br><br>I'm just happy they've given us 3 months to adjust and/or detect problems.  A lot of people out there have unlocked wireless connections.  Just drive into your nearest city with a lap top and look for them.   I bet it would be over the thousands.   I live in a high rise.  16 are unlocked in my building.<br><br>I'll be annoyed if this does not end up replacing throttling, as apposed to adding to it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20241055</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:51:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20240485</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by gurn :</small><br><br>yes you'll max out your speeds with newsgroups on rogers.<br><br>RSkrodzki, a lot of options.  you can track it on each computer.  tons of free apps to do it.  Thats if you want to know all the time anytime without looking on rogers site, and you have something to check rogers tracker.<br><br>what rogers tier are you currently on?<br> </div>Currently I am on Express.  However if they are gonna only charge me upto 25.00 to go over I might not worry that much.  But I still would like a way to track what they are doing, went to see the usage meter earlier and it said it was having technical issues .... not inspiring me with confidence.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20240485</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:01:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20239952</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1162591" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1162591');">puzz1ed</a>:</small><br><br>I got the letter yesterday.  I'm safely under every month but with a marked </div>Hey, I also had a huge spike in January, which is really weird because there was only one person here for most of the month. They said usage in Jan was 120gb, 60 over what I'll be allowed.  I doubt that is accurate.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20239952</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:54:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20239403</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : yes you'll max out your speeds with newsgroups on rogers.<br><br>RSkrodzki, a lot of options.  you can track it on each computer.  tons of free apps to do it.  Thats if you want to know all the time anytime without looking on rogers site, and you have something to check rogers tracker.<br><br>what rogers tier are you currently on?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20239403</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:29:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20239081</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I primarily use my net for newsgroups so does it matter which provider I'm with? Will I still be able to max out my speed?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20239081</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:50:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20238203</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I don't know why they would say you could download 15 high def movies a month...if I was a new user I would look at that and be like, only 15.  They should have kept it at regular def and then they could say 50 or more.  That seems more impressive. I'm actually surprised they didn't say something stupid like 2 Million 3-second mpg clips.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20238203</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:29:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20237535</link>
<description><![CDATA[a6why posted : torrents are my primary use for the internet.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20237535</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:57:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20236920</link>
<description><![CDATA[sbrook posted : If you use bittorrents, make sure that they aren't included in the Bell throttling umbrella.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20236920</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:26:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20236860</link>
<description><![CDATA[a6why posted : I checked out all of those websites, nothing impressed me, so i figured i'd stay with Rogers.   Until I came across Velcom. Is it worth the switch?   (cheaper, 34.95 compared to my express @ 44.95, and they also have a 3 month special @ 28.95.. aside from UNLIMITED usage (which they claim), my download speeds would go down from 7mbps to 5mbps, but i dont see that as much of a downside.)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20236860</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:17:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20236842</link>
<description><![CDATA[sbrook posted : Nothing much at the moment unless you want other drama.  (See the Sympatico, Canadian Broadband and TekSavvy forums on this site)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20236842</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:13:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20236742</link>
<description><![CDATA[a6why posted : Just received the letter today. It's really unfortunate. I remember a few years ago, they didn't even implement limits! And now it's gone from 100? (Express), to 60 per month. What are my options for other ISPs in the Ottawa, Ontario region?<br><br>Oh and could anyone please post what the Bell monthly limit for their service that's equivalent to the Express service. Link would be appreciated.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20236742</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:58:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20234893</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Hmm, I got this letter today as well, I just don't understand how an online tool can accurately reflect my usage, and why do they not provide a downloadable usage meter that is synced to theres so we can conveinently see how much we are using in real time as we use it.  Checking a website constantly to keep track is a pain in the rear. <br>I have 2 computers with 2 distinct ip addresses from Rogers but they arent seperated on the meter so I can see what the other user is doing for usage.  I am also gonna have to see about another ISP too because I farm out around 30,000 photographs a month from events and weddings and car races for processing, leaving not much bandwidth for other stuff, glad these come back to me as DVD's anyone know a good ISP for business stuff ?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20234893</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:26:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20233502</link>
<description><![CDATA[penandpaper posted : My counter doesn't match theirs, i'm dissappointed at their "scare" tactics. I'd much rather Microsoft's law office be my penpal.<br><br>Like the newb i am, i just got a newer PC and tossed my old one along with the info :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20233502</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:46:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20233414</link>
<description><![CDATA[puzz1ed posted : I got the letter yesterday.  I'm safely under every month but with a marked spike in January.  Pretty sure it's fairly accurate.  My letter say that the overage charges "may" be a concern to me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20233414</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:21:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20232487</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : hey penandpaper whats your real usage reported on the web site for those months?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20232487</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:10:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20232432</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by Nylink :</small><br><br>The funny thing is, when I go to check my internet usage, I get this message:<br><br>"The account ****** you are checking is not an internet account. In order to view your Internet services, you must add Hi-Speed service to your Rogers account. Please click here to order Rogers Hi-Speed service."<br><br>LOL, thanks a lot there Rogers.<br> </div>you called about the "changes you made" comment?  I wouldnt have wasted my time.  That phrase probably came from the rate increase its just worded wrong and/or the computer doesn't realize who made the change,  rogers or you. Only time of year its rogers is once for the rate increase.   By chance did you see a increase in your bill? The 20min hold makes me think something else was wrong possibly.  Also possible you had a promotion that ended, and again in that case its worded wrong.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20232432</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:50:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20232252</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I have received the same letter. In fact it is exactly the same in the fact that the load chart is the same as my letter in so much that graph for Jan. falls right on the same amount!<br>This makes me wonder as to whether those numbers have any actual metrics behind them!! <br><br>In my opinion I think that quite a number of people have been sent the same letter to get the same reaction and that the so called chart has simply been manufactured to produce the same effect of shock! ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20232252</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:59:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20229712</link>
<description><![CDATA[magnus2 posted : Your husband could play games online for 2040 hours per month...? What kinda math is that?<br><br>Download 15 HighDef movies a month? (8-12Gb x 15 is 60Gb?)<br><br>Send and receive (exactly?) 6,291,456 e-mails, obviously wouldn't matter the length or size of attachments...<br><br>1,572,864 (excatly?) web pages, no matter the content?<br><br>Yet they can't handle keeping track of our "real" usage...??]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20229712</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:35:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20229352</link>
<description><![CDATA[d0rmamu posted : So, this seems like confirmation enough?  On the bright side there is a $25 cap on over-usage charges after all.  Still it's probably 'bye bye' to Rogers for me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20229352</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:27:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20229090</link>
<description><![CDATA[CFoo posted : My usage tools says the same thing but its also down for me.  Its been stuck since Mar 3rd and states<br><br>* There is no current usage for this account:<br><br>I hope it stays that way forever.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/999705" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=999705');">accat13</a>:</small><br><br>Just had a look at my so called "usage tool"....I take exception to this comment I found on the page.... "*You have changed your Hi Speed Internet service within this billing period. The &#145;Service Includes&#146; amount below reflects the highest inclusive GB between your old and new service. The next usage period will reflect the inclusive GB for your current service.".....I would really like to know what changes "I have made"....NONE...All the references to 100 gig have disappeared,replaced with a nice little 0<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20229090</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:40:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20229086</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Oh, I called them the same day. I was diverted 3 times,  and put on hold for about 20 minutes. Not that bad, I can tolerate that (I had nothing better to do anyway).<br><br>But they said to change the account number on the page to the one from my recent bill. Too bad the account numbers were the same, so it made no difference.<br><br>SO I'm stuck not knowing until they can sort it out.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20229086</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:39:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20228664</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : if you played 4 hours of WOW and didn't download anything else.  how much bandwidth total would you have used?  upload and download ruffly]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20228664</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:23:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20228035</link>
<description><![CDATA[penandpaper posted : <A HREF="http://img187.imageshack.us/my.php?image=rogers1aw0.gif"> <IMG SRC="http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/5858/rogers1aw0.th.gif"> </a><A HREF="http://img187.imageshack.us/my.php?image=rogers2ok5.jpg"> <IMG SRC="http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/1822/rogers2ok5.th.jpg"> </a><A HREF="http://img510.imageshack.us/my.php?image=rogers3wl4.jpg"> <IMG SRC="http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/203/rogers3wl4.th.jpg"> </a><A HREF="http://img255.imageshack.us/my.php?image=rogers4uz5.jpg"> <IMG SRC="http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/3471/rogers4uz5.th.jpg"> </a>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20228035</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:32:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20227757</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Can someone post one of the usage letters they are sending out?  <br><br>I haven't gotten rogers mail in about 2 years,  I dont know why i haven't and im not going to call them and have them fix that heh.  I think its because i asked to be put on do not solicit or i moved and they haven't updated some spam address somewhere.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20227757</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:35:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20227310</link>
<description><![CDATA[accat13 posted : Just had a look at my so called "usage tool"....I take exception to this comment I found on the page.... "*You have changed your Hi Speed Internet service within this billing period. The &#145;Service Includes&#146; amount below reflects the highest inclusive GB between your old and new service. The next usage period will reflect the inclusive GB for your current service.".....I would really like to know what changes "I have made"....NONE...All the references to 100 gig have disappeared,replaced with a nice little 0]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20227310</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:52:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20226528</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : if you can't add your account properly call rogers and have your internet account added.  you'll see your internet account number on the internet page of your bill. Sometimes its not the same as your account number on the first page.  depends on the services you have.<br><br>once you've registered it correctly on the web site you'll be able to view your usage. I had to get them to do it for me because over the last 10 years i've forgotten what i'd registered and under what name.<br><br>Its very helpful in reducing your usage and detecting if your wireless has been comprimised etc, or how much playing WOW actually uses (practicly nothing)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20226528</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:53:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20224198</link>
<description><![CDATA[penandpaper posted : I've made a conscious decision to jump OFF the grid. If enough people follow, they should start feeling it where it really hurts, "their bottom line"<br><br>The government isn't intervening because i'm sure they're getting a piece of the action; until we have a real government that's actually concerned about their public and not themselves as seen in so many industries where the consumer is always at the bottom of the food chain, only then wll something be done about the gouging.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20224198</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:23:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20223576</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : The funny thing is, when I go to check my internet usage, I get this message:<br><br>"The account ****** you are checking is not an internet account. In order to view your Internet services, you must add Hi-Speed service to your Rogers account. Please click here to order Rogers Hi-Speed service."<br><br>LOL, thanks a lot there Rogers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20223576</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:38:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20223247</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I got a letter in the mail today. It stated that they will start charging for overages starting in June (you will see the charges on your July bill). They will credit you for overages for the months of march, april, and may.<br><br>They have a chart at the bottom of the letter showing your bandwidth usage too.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20223247</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:48:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20219554</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I hate to say this, but I think it has gotten to the point that Rogers (and maybe even Bell) want people to switch to other providers if they are using way too much bandwidth.  They want everyone who uses too much bandwidth off their network.  <br><br>And as for other DSL providers, do you really think they are going to keep offering unlimited internet when everyone jumps from Rogers or Bell?  Maybe that explains why a lot of new DSL providers go bankrupt within the first year.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20219554</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:15:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20217119</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : 200gigs will keep me quit and satisfied, like teksavvy their cap is 200gigs, and price for more bandwidth is reasonable 10$ for another 100gigs<br><br>not advertising teksavvy, just saying that rogers needs to be more reasonable, or i will switch, dsl modem is only 20$ at my local store]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20217119</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:24:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20214849</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Where are people seeing as of June charging starts? I don't see this anywhere on Rogers site or the other site they have up.  <br><br>I do see the charges are coming and the cap at $25 max apparently (who knows how long that'll last) but no official date except for Extreme Plus (i'm really surprised that got 95GB, it should be at least 150GB, oh well)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20214849</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:30:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20212878</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : long ago when i was very new to rogers internet service i was cut off.   came home sat down no internet but the tv was working.  called in and was informed i had a virus that was sending out 10,000 emails an hour and had been doing so for days.  The tech was very nice and asked if i need to be aloud online to download a virus scan or update the one i had.  I elected to clean it and call back.  service was turned on np.  <br><br>In other experence on here i've seen people saying they use 1000+ gigs a month without a peep from rogers.<br><br>But like sbrook says,  who knows.  <br><br>rogers is stating only %10 of its users go over those caps, would rogers trim %10 of fat? hope not. %10 is still a lot of revenue. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20212878</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:22:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20212787</link>
<description><![CDATA[sbrook posted : The problem is we have NO way to know what the answers are to questions like that will be.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20212787</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:56:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20212771</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I'm not trolling. :)  I am just repeating what I was told (but I do agree the Rogers Reps are not exactly up to speed on information within their company).  <br><br>I agree the best thing to do is to wait till early April and see what's exactly in the letter.  <br><br>But let's say that the $25 cap is correct, what happens to someone who already his that cap.  Will Rogers cut that person off?  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20212771</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:53:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20212695</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : chopsuey not sure if your trolling or confused or misinformed.  the only tiers that aren't cap'd is the grandfathered tiers ultra lite and lite purchased before this year.<br><br>Please read my cut and paste of the faq about 1 page back on this thread. They make it very clear when,where,how each tier is caped and to what $ amount.  all of them are $25 cap.  Maybe you confused the csc's answer.  You understand you can download over your cap by 50GB's but only pay $25 right? Some people are new to the concept like Long distance plans that cap at $20 a month unlimited north america.  you make $500 in calls and you only pay $20.<br><br>Everyone should be getting mail soon or early april regarding the changes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20212695</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:34:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20212608</link>
<description><![CDATA[darrylr posted : When asking important questions like these it is best to do a survey of CSR's. You're likely to determine the most likely answer after asking a minimum sample of 10 CSR's.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20212608</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:14:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20212586</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Okay folks, I just spoke to a rep at Rogers at he said that there the $25 cap is only for Extreme Plus, or the lite plans (purchased after Jan 14/08).  If you have Express for example, there is no cap, which means if you go over by 50 GB for the month, you will be charged $100!<br><br>Quite a few Express users will get a big surprise on their June invoice.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20212586</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:09:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20212549</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I did some reading on this on Rogers web site, and I think the $25 cap is only for Rogers Extreme Plus.  If you have Rogers Express, there is no $25 cap.  Can anyone confirm this from Rogers directly or from their web site?  <br><br>Since the overage billing doesn't start till June 1st, are people going download crazy right now? :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20212549</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:58:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20205475</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : croat they are going to start charging on your next bill, but they will be crediting it back for a few months.  just to let customers adjust to it.  That and the fact they realize they can't expect everyone to read the notices they are sending out when at the same time they are spaming advertisements that most people toss.<br><br>I do know you need to be carefull when your downgrading during a billing cycle.  lets say croat was at 60g's downloaded+uploaded and downgraded to 25g cap.  Possibility us you'd pay for 35g's($25cap)<br><br>I would guess people will start being billed without credits for usage in june.<br><br>Anyone got any notices in the mail about this yet?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20205475</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:08:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20200869</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Hi.<br><br>I recently switched from Rogers HS Express to Lite.<br>My monthly cap used to be 60 gb, now it is 25 gb, which really sucks. But what can I do....<br><br>When does Rogers start charging for going over the limit? Is it June 1, 08?<br>Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20200869</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:58:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20200666</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Ugh Cable monopolies disgust me.  Constantly raising prices and lowering service, cable is a definitive example of why monopolies are bad, period.  Of course my usage has always been ~ 40-50GB, but it pisses me off that these announcements by cable operators (including US ones like time warner) coincides with the creation of several legitimate movie download and streaming services.  Just when the masses are about to increase their usage they pull this stunt before the average person can start using the bandwidth they paid for (in other words keep their TV monopoly as well).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20200666</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:13:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Bandwidth-Alllocation-20200605</link>
<description><![CDATA[GKC posted : <i>Thanks for clearing this up...misread wrong.  Sorry for the misunderstanding.</i> :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Bandwidth-Alllocation-20200605</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:30:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bandwidth Alllocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20200236</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : not correct GKC.  You need to read what you just quoted. <br>"*If this product was purchased before Jan 14/2008, there is <b>no maximum charge</b> for additional use."<br><br>no maximum, not no usage charges at all.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bandwidth-Alllocation-20200236</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:03:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

