<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>standard Cable T.V. with an L.C.D.  T.V in Cox HSI</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20265862</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:58:21 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:58:21 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: standard Cable T.V. with an L.C.D.  T.V</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20303114</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/430868"><b>Ender3rd</b></A> : I had the same concern when I purchased my LCD TV and I found what others did, that the results were somewhat mixed. When Cox went through my neighborhood and upgraded the lines on the street for 1 GHz, my signal quality improved greatly and so did my SD picture quality. Contrast and sharpness are at least as good on my LCD as they are on my 27" Panasonic Tau CRT. If you have a good quality signal coming in from the street, I doubt you will be disappointed.<br><small>--<br>My Jeep is not an SUV.  Your SUV is not a Jeep.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20303114</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:39:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: standard Cable T.V. with an L.C.D.  T.V</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20298166</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/198350"><b>joako</b></A> : Get a TV with a QAM tuner and you'll be able to pickup some HD or DCS stations. Note some TVs have a "digital" or "HD tuner" but only support OTA and not QAM.<br><small>--<br>09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B:D8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20298166</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:03:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: standard Cable T.V. with an L.C.D.  T.V</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20280614</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : SD picture quality on an HDTV does depend, at least somewhat, on the quality of the SD signal, the size and quality of the TV, and the viewing distance.<br><br>Usually, the bigger the screen size of the HDTV, the worse SD will look.<br><br>The other thing that helps SD look worse is that you will now have HD channels to compare with the SD channels. Then, there is the whole issue of the ratio (4x3 vs 16x9). 4x3 isn't much fun on a widescreen TV, regardless if it is boxed or stretched.<br><br>After a couple of months with my new 46" LCD, about the only SD content I can tolerate is up-res'd widescreen DVD content.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20280614</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 04:43:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: standard Cable T.V. with an L.C.D.  T.V</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20277139</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1386840"><b>TheHarvester</b></A> : Thanks for the reply guys. Our picture quality now is good 99% of the time, so I assume (I know I know) the signal strength is good. Looking forward to a nice wide screen H.D.T.V.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20277139</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:26:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: standard Cable T.V. with an L.C.D.  T.V</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20268674</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377729"><b>dvd536</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  TheHarvester <A HREF="/useremail/u/1386840"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>We are looking into getting a 42" L.C.D. TV and wondering what the picture looks like on the standard cable channels. With the limited HD channels I don't want the majority of the TV watching to have a crappy picture. My parents bought a 50" 1080 (p or I, not sure) LCD and with the  Satellite service they have the picture looks poor. I know they have not done any adjustments to the picture which may be part of the problem. What are your opinions on the picture quality with the non HD channels?</div>Thats because the satellite was what we call "HD-LITE"!<br>what comes out is only as good as whats going into it<br><small>--<br>You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20268674</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 07:07:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: standard Cable T.V. with an L.C.D.  T.V</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20266188</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/714280"><b>nmlobo</b></A> : Wierdo is correct.  What you experience will depend upon the video processor within the TV and your signal quality.  SD on my JVC LCD is 'near' DVD quality.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20266188</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:11:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: standard Cable T.V. with an L.C.D.  T.V</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20265904</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/317310"><b>wierdo</b></A> : It depends entirely on your particular TV set and the quality of your cable feed.<br><br>My old TV looked pretty so-so, my new one looks as good as any SDTV ever did, or at least very close. We have good signal strength, though. If you don't, you may have different results. <br><small>--<br>It's w<i>ie</i>rdo, not w<i>ei</i>rdo. Yes, I know that's not the 'proper' spelling of the similar english language word. ;)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20265904</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:22:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>standard Cable T.V. with an L.C.D.  T.V</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20265862</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1386840"><b>TheHarvester</b></A> : We are looking into getting a 42" L.C.D. TV and wondering what the picture looks like on the standard cable channels. With the limited HD channels I don't want the majority of the TV watching to have a crappy picture. My parents bought a 50" 1080 (p or I, not sure) LCD and with the  Satellite service they have the picture looks poor. I know they have not done any adjustments to the picture which may be part of the problem. What are your opinions on the picture quality with the non HD channels?<br> I am with  Cox in Orange county, Ca. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20265862</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:14:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
