Re: Surprised in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20269887 en Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:28:07 EDT Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:28:07 EDT Re: Surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20270704 Pirate515 :
said by CableConvert See Profile :

Since most IP's they use are blacklisted as soon as they appear, it makes that one step more difficult.
If you are referring to some of these RIAA-blocking tools, they are just as effective as a water gun against a brick wall. A lot of RIAA/MPAA contractors who do the catching probably use residential accounts from their own homes. There could be one right next door to you for all you know.
--
Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies...
A MESSAGE to the RIAA and the MPAA: You shouldn't wound what you can't kill... ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20270704 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:26:01 EDT Re: Surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20269887 CableConvert : I think this ruling has more implications on pending cases rather than future cases. It will, of course cost the RIAA more money to bring these to trial now. Since most IPs they use are blacklisted as soon as they appear, it makes that one step more difficult]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20269887 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:56:23 EDT Re: Surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20269631 Nightfall :
said by KrK See Profile :

This is common sense... but not really a high burden for the RIAA.

All they have to prove is that a copyrighted file was actually downloaded by someone else.... instead of just being offered. ... This really offers little protection for the offender.

What it does mean is that in the lawsuit the RIAA would have to prove you actually broke the law instead of just assuming you did.
I agree, this isn't hard to prove. All they have to do is watch what hosts are connected to the peer and when they are downloading. It isn't rocket science or anything.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20269631 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:14:10 EDT Re: Surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20269577 KrK : This is common sense... but not really a high burden for the RIAA.

All they have to prove is that a copyrighted file was actually downloaded by someone else.... instead of just being offered. ... This really offers little protection for the offender.

What it does mean is that in the lawsuit the RIAA would have to prove you actually broke the law instead of just assuming you did.
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20269577 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:03:51 EDT Surprised http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20269043 Mega DETH : WOW! I would have never thought it would go this way.

Might not survive review?
--
"Action does not equal Achievement"]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20269043 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:14:19 EDT