<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: U-Verse HSI/TV in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20272047</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:21:20 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:21:20 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: U-Verse HSI/TV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20272907</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1304890"><b>Sammer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  morbo <A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>logically, it makes little sense to pay MORE for a service that's provided for significantly less by reputable, national firms. so, yes, idiot is a decent descriptor.<br> </div>Vonage is the one that most people will have heard of and some would say the jury is still out on that reputable part. Your descriptor might be accurate for those that bought Vonage stock in their IPO.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20272907</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:15:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: U-Verse HSI/TV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20272905</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/739560"><b>dr3yec</b></A> : That' like saying everyone who gets cable VOIP for $40/month is an idiot.<br><br>I couldnt of said it better!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20272905</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:14:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: U-Verse HSI/TV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20272501</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><b>morbo</b></A> : logically, it makes little sense to pay MORE for a service that's provided for significantly less by reputable, national firms. so, yes, idiot is a decent descriptor.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20272501</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:04:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: U-Verse HSI/TV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20272227</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/507369"><b>spg</b></A> : <br>Battery problem has long since been resolved and the VRAD location is undoubtedly in the Right of Way in a location approved by the governing authority and installed after pulling the required permits from them.<br><br>Next...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20272227</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:14:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: U-Verse HSI/TV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20272047</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : I suppose some consider MagicJack more than a toy but most would not consider it competition to carrier-class VoIP.   dr3yec <A HREF="/useremail/u/739560"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> has MagicJack and is happy, which is fine.  But calling others who want something of a little more substance "idiots" is rather weak.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20272047</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:42:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: U-Verse HSI/TV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20272040</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641190"><b>imrf</b></A> : I'm guessing you haven't had the service for a few months, eh? My buddy had it installed last week and I'd say it's pretty good. My aunt had it installed before Christmas and I saw it then and was not impressed with the service back then. But I viewed it at my buddy's house the other day and it looks to be on track. Channel changing is fast, DVR is way better than what any cable company has out currently. I will agree with the 1 HD as being sucky, that's the main thing holding me back from trying out the service. If they could get at least 2HD streams and 2SD stream going at the same time I'd be happy. As for VOD, they're just getting it off the ground so it will take some time to build up. Comcast was the same way when their service went live. As for internet speeds, I guess it all depends on what package you had.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20272040</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:40:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: U-Verse HSI/TV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20271846</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : i would call att and have them move that  v-rad.  there had a few explode because of bad batterys.  also uverse sucks. i had it for only a week. channel took for every to load the more tv i had on the slow my internet connections was. i could only watch one hd channel at a time. most of there on demand cost money too. i went back with comcast. much better and faster service. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20271846</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:01:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: U-Verse HSI/TV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20271798</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1304890"><b>Sammer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  dr3yec <A HREF="/useremail/u/739560"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>40 a month, ouch. A little high with all the competition out there these days. But I guess there is an idiot on every street corner who will get it. Regardless of price. <br> </div>That' like saying everyone who gets cable VOIP for $40/month is an idiot.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20271798</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:52:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: U-Verse HSI/TV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20271779</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/739560"><b>dr3yec</b></A> : 40 a month, ouch. A little high with all the competition out there these days. But I guess there is an idiot on every street corner who will get it. Regardless of price. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20271779</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:47:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: U-Verse HSI/TV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20271729</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : Yah, nothing like the batteries that fall out of incorrectly installed Comcast power supplies.<br><br>The VRAD battery issues were resolved. Nice FUD spreadin' though.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20271729</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:38:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: U-Verse HSI/TV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20271701</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : i hope that box is not in front of your home. att had several of them explode because of a bad battery]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20271701</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:33:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>U-Verse HSI/TV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20271577</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><b>hottboiinnc</b></A> : Does anyone know when U-Verse is hitting Toledo, Oh?  The only thing i see is AT&T putting up V-RADs which there is one right outside my condo and one down the street at another sub division.   But no details on when anything gets turned on.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20271577</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:11:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
