<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Someone at Google needs to put down the pipe. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20281734</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:43:29 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:43:29 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Someone at Google needs to put down the pipe.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20283521</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/550826"><b>Alphy</b></A> : Chill out. <br><br>Where was any other company in this fight?<br><br>Where was Microsoft? Where was Apple? Both of which are sitting on mountains of cash.<br><br>Look, just because Google saw an opportunity to do a PR spin on this (which I agree with you, is all talk) doesn't make them the villain. They moved on some good publicity, with no intention of buying spectrum.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20283521</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:37:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Someone at Google needs to put down the pipe.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20283329</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : I hate spoilers in auctions.<br>Google went out there JUST to be a sh!t disturber, and raise the price on spectrum.  Not like everything isn't expensive enough.<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20283329</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:00:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Someone at Google needs to put down the pipe.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20282772</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : The publicity stunt was propping themselves up as some kind of wireless public guardian when in reality they are cheap publicity-seeking hucksters.<br><br>They are in the advertising business.  Never forget that.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20282772</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:29:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Someone at Google needs to put down the pipe.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20282721</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1304890"><b>Sammer</b></A> : If Google wants to put an extra 1.3 billion in the U. S. Treasury the Feds won't turn it down, D block is still available. Their shareholders probably wouldn't like such a publicity stunt.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20282721</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:19:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Someone at Google needs to put down the pipe.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20282059</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : Correct, which is why I call Google a sham bidder in it for the publicity.  Releasing statements now which make them sound like they have some benevolent motive is even sleazier, since they appear to be aimed at silencing the criticism.<br><br>Especially that part about doing it to increase the money into the Treasury.  What a pot of marketing diarrhea.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20282059</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:22:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Someone at Google needs to put down the pipe.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20282030</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1304890"><b>Sammer</b></A> : That's true it was really just a publicity stunt for Google but assuming Verizon Wireless and the other winners really wanted the C Block it didn't change their bidding.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20282030</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:16:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Someone at Google needs to put down the pipe.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20281947</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : All they did was use this as an opportunity for a lot of free publicity.  Their participation was unnecessary and they had no intention of winning anything, just like an eBay bidder who knows the competition will outbid them running up the price for fun or revenge.<br><br>If they wanted to assure open systems they should have bid to win.  Their PR posturing is sickening.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20281947</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:03:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Someone at Google needs to put down the pipe.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20281893</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/939879"><b>openbox9</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Airwolf7 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1123227"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>You can mark my words that someday Google will become a more hated company than Microsoft, just give them enough time.</div>They already are in some circles.<div class="bquote"><small>said by  Airwolf7 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1123227"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>it's going to be fun watching all of these people getting their little hearts broke when Google does something EVIL.</div>Not necessarily evil, but look around here at all of the Google zealots that were certain that Google was going to win the spectrum auction and deploy free/affordable Internet service from coast to coast.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20281893</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:54:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Someone at Google needs to put down the pipe.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20281890</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1304890"><b>Sammer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  RadioDoc <A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><i>"Based on the way that the bidding played out, our participation in the auction helped ensure that the C Block met the reserve price."</i><br><br>I don't think the C block needed any help.  All they did was drive up the price their "competition" paid, just like some sleazebag on eBay.<br><br><i>"In fact, in ten of the bidding rounds we actually raised our own bid -- even though no one was bidding against us -- to ensure aggressive bidding on the C Block."</i><br><br>Again, what the hell is that all about?  Sounds more like a sham bidder to me.<br> </div>All they did was assure the C block met the reserve price. Someone had to bid at least that much to assure a winning bid. Both the A and B blocks are well above their reserves while the C block is just barely above.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20281890</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:54:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Someone at Google needs to put down the pipe.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20281866</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>OverModded</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  RadioDoc <A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>That whole statement reeks of PR spin from a company who talked the talk but did not walk the walk.<br> </div>In the poker game that was the FCC auction, Google played the part of a <A HREF="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fourflusher">fourflusher</a> and a <A HREF="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tinhorn">tinhorn</a>. That they are patting themselves on the back about this is really pathetic.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20281866</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:49:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Someone at Google needs to put down the pipe.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20281734</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1123227"><b>Airwolf7</b></A> : You can mark my words that someday Google will become a more hated company than Microsoft, just give them enough time.<br><br>I never drank the Google Kool-Aid, but so many people have and it's going to be fun watching all of these people getting their little hearts broke when Google does something EVIL.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20281734</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:29:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Someone at Google needs to put down the pipe.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20281639</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : Good lord.  Have they finally gone around the bend?<br><br><i>"Based on the way that the bidding played out, our participation in the auction helped ensure that the C Block met the reserve price."</i><br><br>I don't think the C block needed any help.  All they did was drive up the price their "competition" paid, just like some sleazebag on eBay.<br><br><i>"In fact, in ten of the bidding rounds we actually raised our own bid -- even though no one was bidding against us -- to ensure aggressive bidding on the C Block."</i><br><br>Again, what the hell is that all about?  Sounds more like a sham bidder to me.<br><br><i>"In turn, that helped increase the revenues raised for the U.S. Treasury,"</i><br><br>Now that may be a new record in PR spin.<br><br><i>" while making sure that the openness conditions would be applied to the ultimate licensee.</i>"<br><br>Sadly, they did nothing of the kind, as Karl has repeatedly pointed out.<br><br>That whole statement reeks of PR spin from a company who talked the talk but did not walk the walk.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20281639</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:11:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
