Alphy
join:2001-12-31
Troy, MI | reply to RadioDoc
Re: Someone at Google needs to put down the pipe.
enjoy being bitter |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | reply to Alphy
Enjoy the Kool Aid. |
|
Alphy
join:2001-12-31
Troy, MI | reply to RadioDoc
Since they offered Gmail, Picasa, Google Maps, Google Reader, Google Groups...Hm, give me 5min, I can think of a few more. |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | reply to Alphy
How long have you been a blind supporter?
I have no grudge against them or any other company until they pull a slimy stunt like this.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
Alphy
join:2001-12-31
Troy, MI
1 edit | reply to RadioDoc
How long have you had a grudge against Google?
And also, what do you make of their mobile operating system they're working on?
Again, Google has/is offering me services that everyone else is too tepid to; for fear of stepping on the toes of wireless providers. Sure, at&t can bundle in whatever crap software they want to put in Android in order to get it on the network, but I'll never use it. |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
 ·AT&T Midwest
| reply to Alphy
They are an advertising company first and foremost.
That you don't find it inconsistent with good public stewardship (which is the cloak they drape upon themselves) that they bid in an auction they had no intention of winning just to get PR pretty much ends this discussion. Microsoft or Yahoo are not relevant because, surprise!, they didn't bid nor did they make a bunch of noise going into the auction trying to drum up support for a cause they had no intent of advancing.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
Alphy
join:2001-12-31
Troy, MI
1 edit | reply to RadioDoc
I don't think a huckster would be developing an open operating system that would tie in multiple services which are currently crippled by the wireless providers (GPS comes to mind).
Yes, they are an advertising company and will use this to money. Welcome to America
My point is that Google has added SIGNIFICANT value to my online experience, to my knowledge, has cost me nothing. I can live with the fact they tried to put a PR spin on this auction. Big deal. They really didn't have enough cash to win; Verizon would have opened a 10-15 billion line of credit if they had to. Their existence depended on them winning this.
Google still holds my faith and trust, much more than Microsoft or Yahoo. This remains unchanged. |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
| reply to Alphy
Just stating facts.
Who expected any other outcome? That's the point. Google ran in, talked a good game like any PR huckster would, collected their ill-gotten fluffy press coverage and then disappeared. Had they truly been committed to open access they would have bid to win.
Instead they issue press releases slapping themselves on the back for a non-job well done. They are very good at advertising their own brand.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
Alphy
join:2001-12-31
Troy, MI | reply to RadioDoc
Let's not get Ad hominem or anything.
Tell me, what other outcome did you expect in this situation? |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | reply to Alphy
Fucking apologists are everywhere.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
Alphy
join:2001-12-31
Troy, MI
| reply to RadioDoc
Chill out.
Where was any other company in this fight?
Where was Microsoft? Where was Apple? Both of which are sitting on mountains of cash.
Look, just because Google saw an opportunity to do a PR spin on this (which I agree with you, is all talk) doesn't make them the villain. They moved on some good publicity, with no intention of buying spectrum. |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
| reply to Sammer
The publicity stunt was propping themselves up as some kind of wireless public guardian when in reality they are cheap publicity-seeking hucksters.
They are in the advertising business. Never forget that.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
Sammer
join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA
1 edit | reply to RadioDoc
If Google wants to put an extra 1.3 billion in the U. S. Treasury the Feds won't turn it down, D block is still available. Their shareholders probably wouldn't like such a publicity stunt. |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
| reply to Sammer
Correct, which is why I call Google a sham bidder in it for the publicity. Releasing statements now which make them sound like they have some benevolent motive is even sleazier, since they appear to be aimed at silencing the criticism.
Especially that part about doing it to increase the money into the Treasury. What a pot of marketing diarrhea.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
Sammer
join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA | reply to RadioDoc
That's true it was really just a publicity stunt for Google but assuming Verizon Wireless and the other winners really wanted the C Block it didn't change their bidding. |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
| reply to Sammer
All they did was use this as an opportunity for a lot of free publicity. Their participation was unnecessary and they had no intention of winning anything, just like an eBay bidder who knows the competition will outbid them running up the price for fun or revenge.
If they wanted to assure open systems they should have bid to win. Their PR posturing is sickening.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
