site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1292
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


supergirl

join:2007-03-20
Pensacola, FL

I think Net Neutrality should stick around...

Because in the USA, wouldn't that be violating free speech? Eventually, HSI access will be free or cost little. That is where the Telcos are going due to cellphones. Now, that doesn't mean free license to pirates. I don't think the ISPs are being particularly smart since anyone can knock off anyone eventually. WalMart won't be around forever. A better biz plan will come along and knock them out.

In fact, I think all HSI should be regulated like the Phone companies. Nobody complains when you use your unlimited minutes so the false ads about HSI are the ISPs fault.
--
Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton.
-Supergirl

RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11

You may need a better example. Cellphones = telcos. But I get your point.

What we really need is common carrier status for all Internet connections. Content neutral, take-all-comers, no proprietary or parochial funny business.

As a matter of Constitutional law, an ISP throttling traffic is not a speech issue unless the government is the ISP.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.



supergirl

join:2007-03-20
Pensacola, FL

said by RadioDoc:

As a matter of Constitutional law, an ISP throttling traffic is not a speech issue unless the government is the ISP.
Actually, you're wrong. Cases can be made that access to news, regardless of whom, and information is a Constitutional 1st Amendment issue. It could also be a violation of Interstate Commerce laws, which derive from the Constitution as all Federal Law does.
--
Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton.
-Supergirl

RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11

Wrong. Throttling is not a speech issue. Maybe an interstate commerce issue but not restraint of free speech. But who cares. Certainly nobody here.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.


Ahrenl

join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA

The 1st Amendment only protect you from the government. Any private establishment, or network, can tell you to shut up on their property.

Of course, since networks are built in public land, that begs the question of maybe you're right.



supergirl

join:2007-03-20
Pensacola, FL

said by Ahrenl:

The 1st Amendment only protect you from the government. Any private establishment, or network, can tell you to shut up on their property.

Of course, since networks are built in public land, that begs the question of maybe you're right.
Kudos! Someone got it!
--
Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton.
-Supergirl

RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11

I'd love to see your law degree.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.


Tuesday, 29-May 20:23:02 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics