Re: Charging a fee for what should be free.

BF69 join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN	reply to KoolMoe Re: Charging a fee for what should be free. said by KoolMoe : Yeah, and just wait til the net hits 'by-the-byte' pricing. So we'll pay for wireless service by-the-minute and by-the-byte for our internet. Sweet. KM wear tin foil hat much? There will NEVER be pure 'by-the-byte' billing by ISPs. There might be caps then you pay so much for going over, but never cost per byte starting from the first byte. Secondly talking on a cell wouldn't use up more than a GB perhaps 2 GB a month. And you'd have to talk a lot to do that.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-04-07 09:10:15 ·
en102 Canadian, eh? join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA ·RoadRunner Cable ·DSL EXTREME	reply to KoolMoe Not only that... but a) CAPS on service (through broaband ISP) would be an issue b) Wireless carriers would have to wave the CAP on the current wireless data consumption as well as lower fees. Why should I have to pay twice? I pay for my broadband ISP, then I pay for my wireless data which uses my broadband ISP and has caps/restrictions, etc. -- Canada = Hollywood North
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-04-07 00:26:50 ·
KoolMoe Aw Man Premium join:2001-02-14 Annapolis, MD clubs:	reply to morph3ous Yeah, and just wait til the net hits 'by-the-byte' pricing. So we'll pay for wireless service by-the-minute and by-the-byte for our internet. Sweet. KM
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-04-06 21:55:31 ·


Saturday, 28-Nov 08:53:26	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. page compression OFF