  old_dawg "I Know Noting..."
join:2001-09-22 Westminster, MD
| reply to Mr Matt Re: Charging a fee for what should be free.
said by Mr Matt :  I guess the wireless carriers have come up with another alacart special to squeeze some more money out of their subscribers. I observed in one commentary that a wireless carrier wanted an extra $15.00 per month, plus requiring that the customer have broadband service, for the privilege of installing a Femtocell in a customers home. I would think a wireless carrier would give a customer a Femtocell rather than loosing the subscriber because they are not satisfied with the coverage in their home. Of course there is the matter of those pesky service termination fees used to force dissatisfied subscribers to retain unsatisfactory service. Still looking for that free bubble up and rainbow stew all you can eat buffet???. There is no free lunch, repeat after me, there is no free lunch !
Show me a TOS from any wireless carrier that guarantees reception indoors. And D-UH, how do you expect to get a femtocell to function without a broadband connection in the home?. Should that be free as well?. What a maroon! -- "Our network engineers are aware of the problem..." |