http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20302510 en Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:07:17 EDT Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:07:17 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20302939 jonnyb : i agree with Jason completely but i dont think that any cable provider would be stupid enough to take on a project such as this that would not generate the revenue that it would need to generate in order to make a profit after they purchase and upgrade the network.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20302939 Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:04:44 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20302666 bent : You're probably right about that, but instead of selling it, they should farm out a long term lease to someone who can support and deliver.
--
»www.lp.org/issues/family-budget.shtml

"That government is best which governs least" - Thoreau]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20302666 Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:21:59 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20302510 axus : Selling it is sort of a good idea, if it doesn't go from a public monopoly to a private monopoly. Maybe sell shares, get a director, and spin it off into a new company that wholesales to other companies.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20302510 Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:53:33 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20302469 anon : who actually know how to build and run a network. Either to Quest or whoever the cable provider is there, with some guarantees of expansion and delivery. If they aren't interested, find some experienced company who is. In no way should the municipal gov't be involved in running this (as they've already proven).

Do the taxpayers a favor and let someone with marketplace experience act on their behalf. It will be much more successful that way.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20302469 Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:44:47 EDT