<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Fiber failure? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20302548</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:29:11 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:29:11 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Fiber failure?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20302548</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I currently live in Eagle, Colorado -- just down the road. A small segment of our community was originally built with fiber. After changing hands a few times, it eventually ended up being gobbled up by CenturyTel. <br><br>While the (relatively) faster speeds are nice -- 10/768 -- they have yet to fully utilize the system. For example, they run television over fiber, but have yet to add anything other than basic digital cable, with no HD. <br><br>I would assume that although they have the capability to push a great deal amount of bandwidth down the line, they are probably limited by the connection they have to Level3. <br><br>They have also implimented a system-wide port-blocking scheme whereby most inbound TCP and UDP packets are blocked/NAT'd. This creates a problem with BitTorrent, Slingbox, etc... Thus far, they have refused to unblock these ports. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20302548</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:58:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
