republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Pando's Building a Better P2P Mousetrap » Rearranging the deck chairs
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Media Delivery?  
AuthorAll Replies

ross

join:2000-08-16
·Digizip

reply to SuperWISP
Re: Rearranging the deck chairs

said by SuperWISP See Profile :

This "P4P" nonsense is an attempt to quash legitimate complaints from ISPs that P2P is hogging their resources. But it really does nothing to solve the problem. P2P by its very nature is a way of setting up servers on ISPs' networks, taking their upstream bandwidth without paying for it. And "P4P" does nothing to solve that problem.

If content providers want to use ISPs' networks for their servers, they need to pay them for it. It's just fair. Trying to do it without paying their freight is theft of service -- and will result in higher costs for users. If the P4P people really wanted to do something useful, they'd work out a payment scheme which paid the ISPs for the use of their networks.
Bullshit! Users/subscribers, including so-called content providers, already pay for their upstream and downstream bandwidth in the form of the monthly contract amount for internet service, and by providing the content that drives the the money machine. P2P just lightens the load on any single ISP/network by distributing the source files/seeds around. It all equals out in the end. Well, except for those who don't use P2P, and their lack of use just leaves more bandwidth on the table. Everyone using P2P is a content provider, except for the leeches who don't seed or share. Big commercial content providers pay their way as well. Take away the content from the web, and there is very little to drive customers to subscribe service. ISPs get paid for bandwidth up-front, and then get paid for advertising, click stream data, profiling their customers for various commercial interests, etc.. Time for them to stop bitchin' about how they don't get paid double or triple for the same bandwidth they have already oversold. If they want to get paid for "phantom bandwidth", maybe they should think about compensating customers for the raping they give privacy every minute of every day. If they don't like being "dumb-pipe" providers, they can always find some other form of employment.
Forums » Pando's Building a Better P2P Mousetrap« Media Delivery?  


Friday, 05-Dec 11:06:18 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [126] AT&T Metered Billing Trial Hits Second Market
· [101] AT&T Cutting 12,000 Jobs
· [97] UDP BitTorrent Will Destroy The Interwebs!
· [94] Exclusive Screens Of Comcast's New Bandwidth Meter
· [93] Scott Cleland: Google Using 21x The Bandwidth They Pay For
· [90] EFF Challenges Telecom Immunity
· [84] Firefox Extension Leads Amazon Customers To Pirated Alternatives
· [63] Apple: Who Believes Our Ads Anyway?
· [62] Comcast Tries To Slow Verizon's Philly Entry
· [62] Comcast To Offer Bandwidth Use Tracker In January
Most people now reading
· [game] Crazy Game Fun Time!!! [Pub Games]
· Interesting Article from JF to CRTC head! [TekSavvy]
· why do people freak out on planning a wedding? [General Questions]
· Garage Door Track Pulled Off Wall? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· VZ Updates Channel Lineup Web Page [Verizon FIOS TV]
· [WotLK] Hit Rating Cap - Hunters [World of Warcraft]
· Adventures in Bell... a Teksavvy production... [TekSavvy]
· [WotLK] Starting the Rep Grind [World of Warcraft]
· Level 80 PVP gear info? [World of Warcraft]