<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Wow...&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Wow-20310253</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:44:11 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:44:11 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20313725</link>
<description><![CDATA[axus posted : 6Mbit up is more than you can get from anything around here except FIOS.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20313725</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:52:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20312072</link>
<description><![CDATA[yolarry posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/986420" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=986420');">Portmonkey</a>:</small><br><br>Something like this could make living in the sticks a whole new ballgame.  :)<br> </div>Yeah like owning noobs on multiplayer. ahh man I can't wait.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20312072</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:50:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20311217</link>
<description><![CDATA[Portmonkey posted : Holy cow! Wow is right. In one hand I'm wishing we had something like this in the USA and... well, you know in the other. I wonder which will fill up first.  :huh:<br><br>Something like this could make living in the sticks a whole new ballgame.  :)<br>If we did get something like this and it worked, especially if they could improve the latency issues, maybe there would be mass switching of service practically overnight. Then again maybe not because you'd likely have to sell your soul and a kidney to afford it.  <br><small>--<br>Ninja of the Nasty</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20311217</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:50:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20310985</link>
<description><![CDATA[patcat88 posted : Perhaps dialup?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20310985</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:13:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20310671</link>
<description><![CDATA[EPS posted : Well it depends on what you're doing- if you're just viewing webpages and downloading files latency isn't a huge issue, but when you get into real-time things it does become one... hm, isn't online gaming very popular in Japan? That would probably injure this product.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20310671</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:16:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20310620</link>
<description><![CDATA[NOCMan posted : Actually I'd like to see this as a way to deliver large content where latency is not an issue.  If we could work out QOS methods where downloads and such were put on high latency paths then more interactive content could be handled on the low latency paths.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20310620</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:06:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20310482</link>
<description><![CDATA[rcdailey posted : Maybe there is Japanese Self-Defense Force interest in this satellite?  Having broadband available even after a major earthquake could be useful to more than just the general public.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20310482</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:45:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20310335</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : 155mbps is great......but really when your talking 1200 - 1400ms of latency does it really matter?<br><br>I'd rather have better latency then speed..........without good latency you really have nothing.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-20310335</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:17:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Wow...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Wow-20310253</link>
<description><![CDATA[EPS posted : That's really impressive, especially for satellite... though, 155/6 has to be among the least symmetric plans out there.<br><br>Though, I notice this is JAXA, a Japanese government agency, behind the proposal... cue the "free market" people, I guess.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Wow-20310253</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:04:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

