<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: HughesNet sux in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20310346</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:05:33 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:05:33 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: HughesNet sux</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20310346</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1308792"><b>ninjatutle</b></A> : I'm glad to hear the test were A-Ok. I was starting to get a little worried  :hmm:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20310346</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:20:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>HughesNet sux</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20310115</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : wow why can't HughesNet afford one or two of those satellites<br><br>this totally sux we(USA) are 3rd world]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20310115</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:44:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
