scarhappy
join:2007-09-26
Burlington, ON | reply to CanadianISP
Re: Help CAIP in it's CRTC submission re throttling via Bell
Done |
|
devilshaven
@rogers.com | reply to CanadianISP
done |
|
Raptor
Not a Dumptruck
join:2001-10-21
London, ON | reply to CanadianISP
+1 |
|
Sheesh
I Am The Lizard King
Premium
join:2001-04-11
Windsor, ON
clubs:   | reply to CanadianISP
I added mine as well. |
|
morden
join:2005-06-13
Montreal, QC | reply to CanadianISP
Done |
|
Shark_615
join:2006-01-17
Pickering, ON | reply to CanadianISP
done |
|
mr_hexen
join:2007-08-02
Brampton, ON | reply to CanadianISP
Done-didali-Done |
|
CanadianISP
Premium
join:2008-04-09
Beachburg, ON
| reply to CanadianISP
This is excellent, folks. One of the biggest problems in society today is people complaining about policies and laws which they *could* have made a difference by talking to their elected representatives or to the agency responsible, but chose not to.
Each time someone lets the CRTC know their thoughts, it is making it plain that this is not an issue that "only affects a small number of people".
If you've already made a submission to the CRTC, that's great - The next step is to talk to your friends and colleagues and ask them to do the same thing - After all, it affects them, too.
--
Marc Bissonnette
Chief BOFH
»www.canadianisp.com |
|
lij1972
join:2005-09-27
Burlington, ON | Done |
|
moggy
join:2006-01-08
Peterborough, ON | reply to CanadianISP
done |
|
iamdrumming
join:2003-06-08
Niagara Falls, ON | reply to CanadianISP
Done, done, and done!  |
|
MATA7
join:2005-05-29
Mississauga, ON | reply to CanadianISP
Re: Help CAIP in it's CRTC submission re throttling via Bell
send |
|
moezie
join:2004-04-05
Vaudreuil-Dorion, QC | reply to CanadianISP
thanks and submitted |
|
KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
 ·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
 ·Cox HSI
| reply to CanadianISP
GRRR!
Server Error in '/CRTCSubmissionMU' Application.
Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Source Error:
Line 13:
Line 14:
Line 17:
Source File: w:\websites\support\wwwroot\CRTCSubmissionMU\Forms\Controls\ConfirmBanner.ascx Line: 15
Stack Trace:
[NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.]
ASP.forms_controls_confirmbanner_ascx.__DataBindinglnkbtnAdditional(Object sender, EventArgs e) in w:\websites\support\wwwroot\CRTCSubmissionMU\Forms\Controls\ConfirmBanner.ascx:15
System.Web.UI.Control.OnDataBinding(EventArgs e) +99
System.Web.UI.Control.DataBind(Boolean raiseOnDataBinding) +206
System.Web.UI.Control.DataBind() +12
System.Web.UI.Control.DataBindChildren() +216
System.Web.UI.Control.DataBind(Boolean raiseOnDataBinding) +216
System.Web.UI.Control.DataBind() +12
System.Web.UI.Control.DataBindChildren() +216
System.Web.UI.Control.DataBind(Boolean raiseOnDataBinding) +216
System.Web.UI.Control.DataBind() +12
System.Web.UI.Control.DataBindChildren() +216
System.Web.UI.Control.DataBind(Boolean raiseOnDataBinding) +216
System.Web.UI.Control.DataBind() +12
Forms_Telecom.wizMain_ActiveStepChanged(Object sender, EventArgs e) +37
System.Web.UI.WebControls.Wizard.OnActiveStepChanged(Object source, EventArgs e) +105
System.Web.UI.WebControls.Wizard.MultiViewActiveViewChanged(Object source, EventArgs e) +30
System.Web.UI.WebControls.MultiView.OnActiveViewChanged(EventArgs e) +105
System.Web.UI.WebControls.MultiView.set_ActiveViewIndex(Int32 value) +408
System.Web.UI.WebControls.Wizard.set_ActiveStepIndex(Int32 value) +107
System.Web.UI.WebControls.Wizard.OnBubbleEvent(Object source, EventArgs e) +890
System.Web.UI.WebControls.WizardChildTable.OnBubbleEvent(Object source, EventArgs args) +17
System.Web.UI.Control.RaiseBubbleEvent(Object source, EventArgs args) +35
System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.OnCommand(CommandEventArgs e) +115
System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) +163
System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.System.Web.UI.IPostBackEventHandler.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) +7
System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(IPostBackEventHandler sourceControl, String eventArgument) +11
System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(NameValueCollection postData) +33
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +5102
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.42; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.210
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) |
|
GKC
join:2008-03-07
Toronto, ON | Submitted... |
|
CanerisErik
Caneris
Premium,VIP
join:2007-10-03
Toronto, ON | reply to KrK
CRTC has wonderful security practices on their servers...way to go.  |
|
ProfXtra
join:2008-03-28
| reply to CanadianISP
Done, though just today I received an email from the CRTC in response to my earlier letter. It reads, in part:
"The CRTC does not regulate the retail rates or quality of service provided by Internet service providers (ISPs) to their end customers. I therefore suggest you contact your ISP directly regarding your concerns if you have not already done so."
I'm sure this will help, but how much? |
|
ultracat
join:2008-01-30
Toronto, ON
·TELUS
·Bell Sympatico
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| reply to CanadianISP
done:
Types:
Part VII / PN
Subject:
8622-C51-200805153
Comments:
I support the CAIP filing against Bell Canada. I feel that Bell's recent throttling actions are in direct contravention of the spirit and letter of telecommunications law in Canada. I urge the CRTC to provide immediate relief to the independent Canadian ISPs whose businesses have been negatively affected by Bell's unfair, unethical, and in my humble opinion, illegal actions. Bell's throttling of independent Canadian ISPs who are its wholesale customers is, in my opinion, a direct affront to GAS and the Federal Telecommunications Act. Canadians demand net neutrality now! I demand that the CRTC act in good faith and uphold Canadian law and its own past CRTC rulings. Bell is a common carrier and should not use its privileged position as an unfair competitive advantage over small Canadian ISP businesses. |
|
InvalidError
join:2008-02-03
·TekSavvy Solutions..
·Videotron
| said by ultracat  :...and in my humble opinion, illegal actions. Something illegal is not a matter of opinion, it is a matter of law. Unless you know specific laws or law cases that should
prevent Bell from doing what it is doing, there is nothing illegal here until a judge says otherwise.
I sent my letter to the CRTC. My main angles:
1) Bell's throttling is interfering with VoIP services which compete with Bell's phone services, sometimes to the point of rendering them unusable
2) non-throttled internet access is one of the few key differentiating factors between Bell's Sympatico and Bell's wholesale partners
Bell's throttling is effectively killing at least two competitive birds with one stone. |
|
