Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » ISPs Won't Talk To Press About Selling User Browsing Data » Just wrong.
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
40
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Make the data useless... »
« ISPs Won't Talk To Press About Selling User Browsing Data?  
AuthorAll Replies


shoe1

join:2007-09-28
Colfax, CA

Just wrong.

This should be as illegal as wiring tapping, in the US (idk if the article is talking about American ISsP, I don't recognize any listed ISPs). What you do on the internet should be extremely private! Just like your phone calls, even this right is beginning to be thrown out the window in the United states. Just because it's a newer technology with monitoring capabilities does NOT mean your privacy is voided. NO ONE SHOULD EVER MONITOR WHAT YOU DO ON THE INTERNET! The U.S. constitution is there for a reason. If you are to be caught doing something illegal it should proven through a real world encounter, not what some box caching 1s and 0s.


amigo_boy

join:2005-07-22
Tempe, AZ
·Cox HSI
·magicjack.com

said by shoe1 See Profile :

What you do on the internet should be extremely private! Just like your phone calls,
It's probably a matter of expectations. If I had a party line (telephone) I wouldn't expect "extreme privacy." The internet seems a lot like a party line when I can sniff packets and gain information from people who *freely choose not to use encryption*.

This seems tantamount to using a party line (because it was cheaper) and then complaining that my neighbors are telling my business to others.

Mark


gatorkram
Spelling and Grammer impared
Premium
join:2002-07-22
Winterville, NC
clubs:
·Embarq
·linode

reply to shoe1
I agree, it should be illegal for them to do this. It should be illegal for them to do anything with our packets, but pass them along to the next router that does the same.

And you can't really opt out, because the moment they start to do it, you are trapped in the system. You might be able to opt out after the fact, but data has already changed hands.

You should need a court order to do this kind of invasion of privacy.
--
Give me bandwidth or give me death!
»/testhistory/661871/4f240
Forums » ISPs Won't Talk To Press About Selling User Browsing DataMake the data useless... »
« ISPs Won't Talk To Press About Selling User Browsing Data?  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 14:05:45 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [197] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [85] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [65] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [58] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
Most people now reading
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· The aftermath [World of Warcraft]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· [ Classes] ATTN Death Knights - Post your spec for critique! [World of Warcraft]
· Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.42.34 [Security]
· MicroSoft Discontinues Sale of Windows 7 Family Pack in US [Microsoft Help]
· Smoke detectors gone wild [Home Repair & Improvement]