Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Verizon Advertising: Do As We Say, Not As We Do » Time Warners claim is 100% accurate.....
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

nitzan
Premium,VIP
join:2008-02-27
·ViaTalk
·Comcast

reply to Qumahlin
Re: Time Warners claim is 100% accurate.....

said by Qumahlin See Profile :

TW's ad is a direct result of FIOS ads which are designed to tell the public "fiber is better". Sadly the majority of consumers in this country are not knowledgeable on most tech subjects and believe whatever they are told.
Fiber is better. I've had Fios for a couple of years in one of my homes at the 15mb/2mb tier and trust me - it's faster than TW Cable ANY day. You could seriously run a production server off that thing. (we don't...)

The only cable broadband to even get close to the speed and reliability I got from Fios is RCN Cable up in NYC. Those guys rock. As far as TW Cable? they're the worst cable company I've ever had the pleasure of dealing with when it comes to performance - their service crawls. Only Comcast can compete with them for the prestigious spot of #1 sucky ISP.

Seriously though, Verizon totally sucks when it comes to billing, and probably a lot of other aspects too.. but when it comes to delivering fast internet service I have nothing but good things to say. Also- you can be sure that when the guys up at TW decide to start capping high usage users, Verizon will be there to scoop the customers up!

Did I mention I hate Verizon's billing department yet??
--
Nitzan Kon, CEO
Future Nine Corporation

patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

said by nitzan See Profile :

The only cable broadband to even get close to the speed and reliability I got from Fios is RCN Cable up in NYC. Those guys rock. As far as TW Cable? they're the worst cable company I've ever had the pleasure of dealing with when it comes to performance - their service crawls. Only Comcast can compete with them for the prestigious spot of #1 sucky ISP.
RCN is better because they have a higher node density/less people on each node. Their network was HFC from day 1. Not retrofitted like TWC. Also RCN built their network as a Metro Ethernet provider with the expectation of being able to be a business grade last mile provider. If I can Verizon I would have bought RCN, rebranded, and slowly upgraded to a PON architecture. RCN has lots of spare fiber, I see Toilet Paper roll thick fiber on poles in NYC.
Forums » Verizon Advertising: Do As We Say, Not As We Do


Tuesday, 10-Nov 19:23:21 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [113] Moto Sold About 100,000 Droids
· [93] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [86] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [64] Government Will Release Some Telco Wiretap Lobbying Documents
· [54] Verizon's Hanging Up On Rural America
· [34] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [30] Verizon's Higher ETFs Annoy Senator
· [25] Sprint Announces Job Cuts
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [21] Google Offers Free Holiday Airport Wi-Fi
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Holy work line speeds!! [TekSavvy]
· Google Has Acquired Gizmo5 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]
· A fishy CRTC tarriff filed by bell? [TekSavvy]
· Are Gillette Fusion blades made of gold? [General Questions]
· Water heater pilot light won't light [Home Repair & Improvement]
· House inspector failed to find major gas leak [Home Repair & Improvement]