<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Unlocking would be pointless IMO in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20316376</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:46:08 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:46:08 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Unlocking would be pointless IMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20316376</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1373892"><b>iLive4Apple</b></A> : There is no point in unlocking a 3G iphone for T-Mobile because it wouldn't work with T-Mobile's 3G when the release it because T-Mobile's 3G works on 1700mhz/2100mhz and they are the only ones using 1700mhz downlink for 3G, AT&T only uses 850mhz/1900mhz and the rest of the world uses 2100 so we will probaly see a triband 850/1900/2100 3G bands and quad band GSM.<br><small>--<br>I get 29 MPG in my Toyota Highlander Hybrid!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20316376</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:30:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
