  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to KrK Re: Tivo blows
said by KrK :ReplayTV beat TIVO to market. They both came on the scene pretty close together. TIVO was second, a few months behind ReplayTV. 1st to market is not relevant to patent law. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
  Thespis I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV. Premium join:2004-08-03 Keller, TX
| reply to KrK Echostar? E*'s first DVR (they actually called it a PVR) was the DishPlayer 2400. It came out about the same time as Tivo. It was a piece of crap that ran Microsoft software and had to be babysat daily. It also had a whopping 8 hours of record time. I sold mine on Ebay for a tidy sum. The DVR that E* was sued over was the one they developed in house well after Tivo was established with DirecTV. |
|
  KrK Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy Premium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest
| Yes, I stated that already.... However, the feature the patent and lawsuit is based on was already in use and had been developed by other DVR's.
I'm not disagreeing that TIVO got the patent, I just think the patent should be invalidated... which of course would end the lawsuit. Unlikely to occur as well. Echostar is getting ripped off. -- "Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) |
|
  KrK Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy Premium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest
| reply to TKJunkMail said by TKJunkMail :1st to market is not relevant to patent law. Nope.... but prior art or obviousness is... supposed to be. |
|
  Thespis I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV. Premium join:2004-08-03 Keller, TX | reply to KrK Echostar violated a valid patent. Period. They are not getting ripped off. Corporations can't just disregard patent law because they think a patent should never have been given. |
|