No, but the ability to enter and leave Canada most definitely is. The judge ruled that since a passport is required to re-enter Canada, the rights to a passport is also extended. This is why, regardless of the changes to the law, we're going to get into a real interesting situation where any grounds for the denial of a passport will require a Section 1 test. While I could see forgery and temporary court orders withstanding a Section 1 test, the whole denial based on a criminal conviction in the past or a "potential" security threat will most certainly not.