Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC Okays Verizon To Steal Back Defecting Customers » why not?
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
The rules looked clear to me »
« The level field aren't the same for cable as for teleco  

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME

Re: why not?

What I wouldn't want is that my port or attempt to port be held up in limbo while I have to wait for a customer service rep call me back to attempt to make a deal for me.
What makes this different than TV service, is that you can have multiple TV services (FiOS, Cable, Satellite, Uverse) all at the same time, and not care. You can't have your phone number serviced by 2 different companies (unless its separarte for Local vs. LD).
--
Canada = Hollywood North

bcronin
Premium
join:2004-03-27
Hyde Park, NY

Re: why not?

I see your point. Is it possible for someone other than the customer in question to submit a port request? I didn't think so. I thought you have to fax a signed LOA to the provider you want to port-TO. If so, then I've changed my mind, VZ should not be able to delay your port for that last-minute attempt to lure you back. However, back in the early days of long distance deregulation it was apparently possible for your long distance provider to be changed to someone else without your knowledge (I believe it was referred to as "slamming"). I bet VZ is somehow worried about a similar scenario (but it is likely unfounded due to the signed LOA requirement).
ProFiOSDude
Premium
join:2005-05-27
Chesapeake, VA

Re: why not?

The port request is not submitted by the customer, per se. It's submitted by the incoming LEC to the outgoing LEC. There is an intermediary called the 3rd party verifier to prevent slamming. Once the customer initiates a change of service, as soon as they hang up with the 3rd party verification, they have no more involvement until regaining dial tone.

PFD

bcronin
Premium
join:2004-03-27
Hyde Park, NY

Re: why not?

But the customer generally has to provide the intended-new-provider with a signed LOA, no?

idlewillkill
Go Blue
Premium
join:2005-09-28
North York, ON

Re: why not?

Generally, no. Third-party verification effectively replaces this.
Forums » FCC Okays Verizon To Steal Back Defecting CustomersThe rules looked clear to me »
« The level field aren't the same for cable as for teleco  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 23:30:39 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [200] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [108] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [64] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [60] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
Most people now reading
· Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.42.34 [Security]
· Hot Girl falls face first down stairs [56k Lookout (Broadband Heavy)]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· ICC Strats??? [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· ICC strats [World of Warcraft]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· Need some electrical advice - one circuit on two fuses? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Man Downloads Child Porn "Accidentally," Faces 20 Years [Security]