Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC Okays Verizon To Steal Back Defecting Customers » why not?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
The rules looked clear to me »
« The level field aren't the same for cable as for teleco  
AuthorAll Replies


idlewillkill
Go Blue
Premium
join:2005-09-28
North York, ON
reply to bcronin
Re: why not?

Generally, no. Third-party verification effectively replaces this.


bcronin
Premium
join:2004-03-27
Hyde Park, NY
reply to ProFiOSDude
But the customer generally has to provide the intended-new-provider with a signed LOA, no?

ProFiOSDude
Premium
join:2005-05-27
Chesapeake, VA

reply to bcronin
The port request is not submitted by the customer, per se. It's submitted by the incoming LEC to the outgoing LEC. There is an intermediary called the 3rd party verifier to prevent slamming. Once the customer initiates a change of service, as soon as they hang up with the 3rd party verification, they have no more involvement until regaining dial tone.

PFD


bcronin
Premium
join:2004-03-27
Hyde Park, NY

reply to en102
I see your point. Is it possible for someone other than the customer in question to submit a port request? I didn't think so. I thought you have to fax a signed LOA to the provider you want to port-TO. If so, then I've changed my mind, VZ should not be able to delay your port for that last-minute attempt to lure you back. However, back in the early days of long distance deregulation it was apparently possible for your long distance provider to be changed to someone else without your knowledge (I believe it was referred to as "slamming"). I bet VZ is somehow worried about a similar scenario (but it is likely unfounded due to the signed LOA requirement).


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME

reply to bcronin
What I wouldn't want is that my port or attempt to port be held up in limbo while I have to wait for a customer service rep call me back to attempt to make a deal for me.
What makes this different than TV service, is that you can have multiple TV services (FiOS, Cable, Satellite, Uverse) all at the same time, and not care. You can't have your phone number serviced by 2 different companies (unless its separarte for Local vs. LD).
--
Canada = Hollywood North
Forums » FCC Okays Verizon To Steal Back Defecting CustomersThe rules looked clear to me »
« The level field aren't the same for cable as for teleco  


Wednesday, 02-Dec 04:27:00 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [151] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [69] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [56] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [55] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [52] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [37] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [35] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [26] Vivendi Agrees, Comcast/NBC Deal Soon
Most people now reading
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech is either down or gone for good... [Filesharing Software]
· Heating - my dad gave me this advice... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· MagicJack Error Broken Storage [MagicJack]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Security Software Updates - 1 Dec 2009 [Security]
· Data Usage Meter Launched [Comcast HSI]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]