| reply to HiVolt
Re: No response from Bell to CRTC? Anyone? said by HiVolt:said by daboom:This is bull%^&% I hope CRTC weighs in favor of the CAIP. It is BS. Bell has not presented any proof themselves of widespread congestion issues. My area is throttled, and I have been on this remote for 5 years, and never, ever experienced any congestion issues while with Sympatico or TekSavvy. Actually, they've proven that throttling hasn't fixed a thing. They stress, over and over, in that document, that "Other types of traffic quickly filled the space formerly used by p2p." Web traffic started to fill the 16.5% of bandwidth they got back. Streaming traffic filled it. Etc. All they've done is replaced one type of congestion with another. When will they decide that streaming video is the cuplrit and start throttling that, too? Oh, look, internet radio replaced streaming video...lets filter that too...
They state that this is a good thing. I state that when you pump sewage from 10 tanks at a time down a pipe, and shut the valve for one tank without reducing the overall flow, you've changed nothing. The congestion still exists. |
|
 ReformCRTCSupport Your Independent ISP
join:2004-03-07
Canada | Sewage and Bell should always be placed in the same sentence. Along with their corporate spokesagandists. |
|
 AngeloThe Network GuyPremium
join:2002-06-18 | linux iso's get angried when not downloaded! |
|
| reply to ReformCRTC
said by ReformCRTC:Sewage and Bell should always be placed in the same sentence. Along with their corporate spokesagandists. *I* thought it was an appropriate analogy. :-P |
|
