republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Uniqs:
374
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
MySay

join:2008-04-08
Mansfield, TX

Why stop there?

Man, oh man! So, let me get this right... the government is attempting to pass a Bill, making cell phone usage on planes illegal, because they feel people don't want to be BOTHERED by other people talking on them?

Hell, why stop there!? People don't want to look at ugly people to... ban them from going in public! Most of us HATE idiots, keep them inside (oh wait, that means the politicians could never come out and play)!

Point is, most of us HATE a lot of things; however, that gives no reason for big Sam to step in and throw down a hammer! These old farts in suits at the Big House are getting a bit ridiculous!

As I've stated in a post JUST on this topic, ONLY a couple weeks ago... peace and quiet in ANY public atmosphere is not a right in this country (and YES, a commercial plane would qualify as a public place)! 99.9% of the time also, if you were being annoyed by somebody... simply bringing it to their attention and asking them to bring it down would suffice! If not, bring their actions to the appropriate authorities (whether it be the stewardess, police, etc.).

I'm completely worried where this country is heading!

laserjobs
Premium
join:2004-05-02
Las Vegas, NV

Re: Why stop there?

There is some other reason they do not want phones on planes they do not want us to know about.
MySay

join:2008-04-08
Mansfield, TX

1 edit

Re: Why stop there?

said by laserjobs:

There is some other reason they do not want phones on planes they do not want us to know about.
Although you were probably trying to be humorous... your statement actually wouldn't surprise me in the slightest as being accurate. They could be used as detonators, the airlines would rather you use their expensive phones, etc. all come into mind.

There's also a million reasons why 70% of the drivers behind the wheel of a car shouldn't have their license; however, I don't see politicians / lawmakers running to inplace laws prohibiting them to do so for YOUR safety. This would be absurd... and so is the cell phone argument.

kadar
Premium,ExMod 2001-02
join:0000-00-00
said by laserjobs:

There is some other reason they do not want phones on planes they do not want us to know about.
Follow the money.
--
The Revolutionary War was fought over a 14% tax, what % are you paying now?
PDXPLT

join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR
said by MySay:

peace and quiet in ANY public atmosphere is not a right in this country...
I dunno where you live, but in this county, county ordinance prohibits you from unreasonably disturbing the public peace.

It's called majority rule. If enough people don't want it, as expressed through their elected representatives, then that's the way it is.
MySay

join:2008-04-08
Mansfield, TX

4 edits

Re: Why stop there?

And exactly how many people do you know who's been cited for talking on a phone? Exactly! Wanna try again?

"prohibits you from unreasonably disturbing the public peace"

UNREASONABLY... You've even stated it yourself! (ie. screaming excessively, turning the bass at 300% on your stereo system, etc.) Not to mention, I DID state a PUBLIC place! If you ever get out to eat much, or go to a ball game, the noise level at those places are pretty high! Try calling law enforcement at a ball game for somebody cheering too loud (provided he / she isn't breaking other laws with vulgorness, etc.)... we'll see how far you'll get.

"majority rule" Sorry, laws haven't adapted this system for years! What a lawmaker pulls out of his / her ass, is what attempts to get legislated today.

Nick_L
Premium
join:2003-01-22
Pittsburgh, PA

1 edit
never mind.

Nick_L
Premium
join:2003-01-22
Pittsburgh, PA

1 edit
ugh, why cant I get my reply right?

Tuesday, 29-May 20:56:17 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics