http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20345617 en Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:20:32 EDT Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:20:32 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20347419 Kearnstd : that is pretty much what im thinking, cisco sells the hardware to allow this so why not promote it.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20347419 Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:37:30 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20345830 Mchart : Exactly. Traffic shaping = more cisco sales = more people paying for CCNA courses = more money for cisco.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20345830 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:12:42 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20345617 Dominokat : Of course Cisco would support this. They stand to make millions selling thier equipment to Bell (or anyone) to use for "traffic managment."
So why would they NOT support it? ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20345617 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:31:10 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20345603 en102 : Throttling 'everyone' during peak hours has little to do with being innovative.

Attempting to allow the highest amount of throughput at the least expense and inconvenience to uses would be something more innovative.

How about 2 tiers...
Throttled (and cheap) tiers
and
Unthrottled and more expensive tiers

Wait...we can make more money by raising prices and throttling everyone and saving on bandwidth costs. :p
--
Canada = Hollywood North]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20345603 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:28:05 EDT