<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Innovative because?? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20345645</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:03:03 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:03:03 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Innovative because??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20345645</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/981812"><b>jeffster1970</b></A> : They're providing the hardware to Bell Sympatico in order to do this?  Innovative because if it works, other providers can follow suit? <br><br>Innovative because if companies like Bell can get away with it, why not the cable giants too?  I mean, why provide top service if you really don't have to?<br><br>Though I am not 100% sure, my guess is that Cisco and Bell have some sort of partnership here happening.<br><br>Oh well, world is going to hell in a handbag anyway, whatcha going do, eh?<br><small>--<br><b> "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."<br></b><i> Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943 </i></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20345645</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:35:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
