| reply to Gokuu
Re: Kevin Crull and his marketing Someone should send that to CAIP for use in their respnose. If Bell says there's no congestion, then there's no need to throttle. |
|
|
|
| Give me a mailing address and I would be more than happy to.
said by Radar73:Someone should send that to CAIP for use in their respnose. If Bell says there's no congestion, then there's no need to throttle. |
|
Reviews:
 ·Acanac
| I think so far every missed the important line "FIBRE"!!!
Theres no capacity problems with fibre, the capacity problems are on the copper backbone (how could there be when they are prepared to offer you 3x the speed). So far users that have fibre going to their nodes are not throttled. I think Bell thinks they are going to lose this one, so they might as well roll out what they should have been rolling out a bit earlier then they had planned. Since the capacity will decrease on copper this way and no more need to throttle, although this should have been the solution all along. |
|
| We all should call from a payphone and get them going, start asking very technical questions to confuse them. |
|
Reviews:
 ·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to the cerberus
said by the cerberus:I think so far every missed the important line "FIBRE"!!! Theres no capacity problems with fibre, the capacity problems are on the copper backbone (how could there be when they are prepared to offer you 3x the speed). So far users that have fibre going to their nodes are not throttled. That's not true. I'm on a remote (FTTN) and I'm most definitely throttled. The throttling is at the BAS level, not the DSLAM level. Also, Bell has no copper backbone. I'm pretty sure that beyond the DSLAM it's all fibre. |
|
