<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Consumer Privacy &#x22;Do Not Track&#x22; Registry in Security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20349481</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:49:53 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:49:53 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Consumer Privacy &#x22;Do Not Track&#x22; Registry</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20356790</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1140294"><b>Blackbird</b></A> : Hmmm... depending on how it would be handled and disseminated, such a "do not track list" itself could become one very rich target for data-mining by spammers and/or ID thieves...<br><small>--<br>If God wanted us to work with electrons, He'd make them big enough to see...</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20356790</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:34:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Consumer Privacy &#x22;Do Not Track&#x22; Registry</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20349535</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/429050"><b>La Luna</b></A> : <i>...advertisers made clear a strong preference for self-regulation...</i><br><br>Ya' think?  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20349535</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:53:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Consumer Privacy &#x22;Do Not Track&#x22; Registry</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20349481</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/634007"><b>SUMware</b></A> : From <A HREF="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN1520070020080416?sp=true">Reuters</a><br>Apr 16, 2008 -  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr><b>Consumer groups urge "do not track" registry</b><br><br>Two consumer groups asked the Federal Trade Commission on Tuesday to create a "do not track list" that would allow computer users to bar advertisers from collecting information about them.<br><br>The Consumer Federation of America and the Consumers Union also urged the FTC to bar collection of health information and other sensitive data by companies that do business on the Internet unless a consumer consents.<br><br>The call echoed those of other privacy advocates who filed statements with the FTC on Internet companies' use of "behavioral advertising." That is the practice of tracking a computer user's activities online, including Web searches and sites visited, to target advertisements to the individual consumer.<br><br>In comments to the FTC on online behavioral advertising, advertisers made clear a strong preference for self-regulation rather than government dictates on how personal data are collected, what disclosures are made to computer users and how long the information is stored.<br><br>Consumer groups said on Tuesday they were skeptical of self-regulation.<br><br>"Self-policing schemes are not enough to protect consumers' privacy and offer no enforcement against improper behavior," said Chris Murray, senior counsel for Consumers Union, in a statement.<br><br>Several child advocacy groups, including the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and American Academy of Pediatrics, urged the FTC to bar advertisers from collecting information on or advertising to anyone under the age of 18.<hr></blockquote>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20349481</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:42:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
