site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


a333
A hot cup of integrals please

join:2007-06-12
Rego Park, NY

reply to robertfl

Re: seems fishy

I doubt Verizon's case will hold water. It's just an attempt to try to cripple a competitor that actually delivers.


Pathfinder
Dazed Confused
Premium
join:2000-03-26
Mount Vernon, NY
Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Verizon Online DSL

What may be your legal basis for that assessment? If Sprint owes them the money then pay up. Even Sprint agrees that the legal action was taken so the statute of limitations doesn't expire.
Oh and if $10M cripples Sprint then perhaps they shouldn't be in the business anyway.



Qumahlin
Never Enough Time
Premium,MVM
join:2001-10-05
united state

reply to a333

said by a333:

I doubt Verizon's case will hold water. It's just an attempt to try to cripple a competitor that actually delivers.
Cell phone carrier interconnection/roaming agreements are just akin to ISP peering agreements. Your an idiot if you think its just one company trying to cripple the other. Also as PathFinder stated if Sprint can't afford 10 million they have far bigger issues.

Also your probably one of the few people who actually would compare Sprint to Verizon and claim that Sprint is the better service...but thats a whole other discussion for another thread


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

reply to Pathfinder
I agree... Sprint has a lot of debt, and their credit is currently junk status.
Verizon is owed money by Sprint for services... pay up.
Verizon needs the cash to give to Verizon Wireless has to pay for its 700MHz auction winnings.
--
Canada = Hollywood North



Dread
R.I.P Jazzy
Premium
join:2005-02-28
Bronx, NY
kudos:6
Reviews:
·Optimum Online

reply to a333

said by a333:

I doubt Verizon's case will hold water. It's just an attempt to try to cripple a competitor that actually delivers.
I always assumed sprint was for people who couldn't get approved due to bad credit, it's funny seeing them trying to weasel out of paying their bills heh.

ydoucare

join:2003-03-12
Rensselaer, IN
Reviews:
·Embarq Now Centu..

said by Dread:

said by a333:

I doubt Verizon's case will hold water. It's just an attempt to try to cripple a competitor that actually delivers.
I always assumed sprint was for people who couldn't get approved due to bad credit, it's funny seeing them trying to weasel out of paying their bills heh.
ooooooook
--
Asus P5N-E SLI|E4500|2 GB DDR2 800|8800GT|Audigy + Front Bay|Hauppauge PVR-150MCE|Vista Ultimate + XP Pro SP2 dual boot|Sony Vaio VGN-CR290|Sprint Mobile Broadband|Netgear WGR614v8

ydoucare

join:2003-03-12
Rensselaer, IN
Reviews:
·Embarq Now Centu..

2 edits

reply to Qumahlin

said by Qumahlin:

said by a333:

Also your probably one of the few people who actually would compare Sprint to Verizon and claim that Sprint is the better service...but thats a whole other discussion for another thread
So then you could start another thread and explain why Verizon EVDO is better than Sprint EVDO (unlimited)? If you can, then you're a really good bullshitter. I actually could compare them, since I manage both Verizon services (at work) and Sprint (at home).
--
Asus P5N-E SLI|E4500|2 GB DDR2 800|8800GT|Audigy + Front Bay|Hauppauge PVR-150MCE|Vista Ultimate + XP Pro SP2 dual boot|Sony Vaio VGN-CR290|Sprint Mobile Broadband|Netgear WGR614v8

Sunday, 12-Feb 20:14:24 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online! © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics