 QumahlinNever Enough TimePremium,MVM
join:2001-10-05
united state | reply to a333
Re: seems fishy said by a333:I doubt Verizon's case will hold water. It's just an attempt to try to cripple a competitor that actually delivers. Cell phone carrier interconnection/roaming agreements are just akin to ISP peering agreements. Your an idiot if you think its just one company trying to cripple the other. Also as PathFinder stated if Sprint can't afford 10 million they have far bigger issues.
Also your probably one of the few people who actually would compare Sprint to Verizon and claim that Sprint is the better service...but thats a whole other discussion for another thread  |
|
Reviews:
 ·Embarq Now Centu..
2 edits | said by Qumahlin:said by a333:Also your probably one of the few people who actually would compare Sprint to Verizon and claim that Sprint is the better service...but thats a whole other discussion for another thread So then you could start another thread and explain why Verizon EVDO is better than Sprint EVDO (unlimited)? If you can, then you're a really good bullshitter. I actually could compare them, since I manage both Verizon services (at work) and Sprint (at home).
--
Asus P5N-E SLI|E4500|2 GB DDR2 800|8800GT|Audigy + Front Bay|Hauppauge PVR-150MCE|Vista Ultimate + XP Pro SP2 dual boot|Sony Vaio VGN-CR290|Sprint Mobile Broadband|Netgear WGR614v8 |
|
