Reviews:
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| Any difference between KathrynV and AT&T? I'm confused... KathrynV editoralizes (in a "news" article):
quote:
The reality is that Internet providers can circumvent the problem by upgrading their networks in order to meet the demands of their customers.
And, in the article:
quote:
AT&T is investing $19 billion to maintain its network and upgrade its backbone network.
So...
how is it that AT&T isn't doing exactly what KathrynV wants them to? And how is it that they're the bad guys?
Oh... wait... the elephant in the room, only mentioned in the actual article, not the "news article" here on broadbandreports.com...
NETWORK NEUTRALITY.
Yes, folks, we need the GOVERNMENT to make SURE that AT&T invests that money in EXACTLY the way WE want them to.
I would bet a lot of money that if suddenly AT&T said "we're investing $19 billion AND we agree with Net Neutrality legislation", that suddenly all these potshots taken at them here would disappear. |
