<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Mailfoundry Anti-Spam Appliance in Webhosting</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20362787</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:10:22 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:10:22 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Mailfoundry Anti-Spam Appliance</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20539977</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/380736"><b>scooby</b></A> : Late response but what the heck...<br><br>That 1969 time only gets updated when you manually click on a link in the reports section. Not sure why but thats how it is.<br><br>I moved my company from a Barracuda 300 to a Mailfoundry 1150 as part of their current throw back offer and we have been pretty satisfied. Management was ecstatic that we are only paying under $500 per year for the next three years as part of this offer.<br><br>After 30 days, I would give the Mailfoundry a solid A where as the Barracuda would get a B.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20539977</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 04:07:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Mailfoundry Anti-Spam Appliance</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20362787</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/456832"><b>sabersaw</b></A> : We have had one for a year now.  Since this is the first appliance it is hard to compare to anything else.  Coming from Trend Mirco's Linux Mail gateway... <br><br>I like the Mailfoundry alot.  The support is pretty good.  There have been some questionable automatic software upgrades the required tech support.  And the clock always seem to show the year 1969.  But, we had the same problems with Trend Micro.... updates blowing up that is.   They don't combat the ever growing reverse NDR attacks.  There are some appliances that claim to.<br><br>As you can see, we get a lot of spam :D  False positives are rare.  And we only have it set to send the spam digest daily.  Still debating on whether or not to up this interval. <div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/20362787?c=1299629&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMDM2Mjc4Ny54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="156657 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=352 SRC="/r0/download/1299629.thumb600~63f52a6bdc5c7293e1ad65c0360c4d15/untitled.JPG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>Graphing is neat on this</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20362787</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:32:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Mailfoundry Anti-Spam Appliance</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20357821</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/267904"><b>drmorley</b></A> : Does anyone use one of these devices on their network?  My contract with my existing anti-spam provider is expiring and I'm thinking about switching to either a Mailfoundry or Barracuda appliance.  I love to hear some real world opinions.<br><br>Thanks in advance...<br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://mediafly.com/Welcome.aspx" >mediafly.com/Welcome.aspx</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20357821</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:01:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
