 AthlGrondPremium,MVM
join:2002-04-25
Aurora, CO
 ·Comcast
| Western Digital VelociRaptor »www.storagereview.com/WD3000BLFS.sr
Western Digital just came out with their replacement for the 10,000 RPM Raptor hard drive: the VelociRaptor.
Now 300GB in a 2.5" SATA drive, still 10,000 RPM. Pretty impressive performance improvements from the Raptor (~20% better in their game benchmarks), and nice power and noise reductions.
Nicely timed for a summer computer overhaul... 
--
"You are technically correct. The best kind of correct." -Bureaucrat 1.0 |
|
 The FlashYou don't win friends with saladPremium
join:2002-10-17
Toronto, ON
kudos:1 | For 300 bucks, I'd rather go for capacity than speed. |
|
 jouno53Palin 2012
join:2006-03-04
United State | Or a better video card for games. |
|
|
|
AthlGrondPremium,MVM
join:2002-04-25
Aurora, CO Reviews:
·Comcast
| reply to The Flash
said by The Flash:For 300 bucks, I'd rather go for capacity than speed. We must be playing different kinds of games.
--
"You are technically correct. The best kind of correct." -Bureaucrat 1.0 |
|
AthlGrondPremium,MVM
join:2002-04-25
Aurora, CO Reviews:
·Comcast
| reply to jouno53
said by jouno53:Or a better video card for games. Not knocking that. 
If however you are putting together a top end gaming box, at some point improving the graphics will cost incrementally more than the performance gain that you would notice by improving the hard drive.
--
"You are technically correct. The best kind of correct." -Bureaucrat 1.0 |
|
jouno53Palin 2012
join:2006-03-04
United State | I agree, and for those already with the best video card, or close to it, getting an even faster HDD will help |
|
 knightryI'm Not Fat, I'm Festively Plump
join:2002-05-06
Oviedo, FL | reply to AthlGrond
And what reliability!
quote:
According to filtered and analyzed data collected from participating StorageReview.com readers, the Western Digital VelociRaptor WD3000BLFS is more reliable than (collecting data, check back soon!)% of the other drives in the survey that meet a certain minimum floor of participation.
*sigh*
--
It takes two to lie, Marge. One to lie, and one to listen. |
|
The FlashYou don't win friends with saladPremium
join:2002-10-17
Toronto, ON
kudos:1 | said by knightry:And what reliability! quote:
According to filtered and analyzed data collected from participating StorageReview.com readers, the Western Digital VelociRaptor WD3000BLFS is more reliable than (collecting data, check back soon!)% of the other drives in the survey that meet a certain minimum floor of participation.
*sigh* Well the drive is new, give it time. |
|
knightryI'm Not Fat, I'm Festively Plump
join:2002-05-06
Oviedo, FL
1 edit | My point is that the page shouldn't have been included before they had any numbers. Leave it out of the report for now, include it once you have the data. It's like publishing a researching paper and leaving the Results Conclusion section as [insert results and conclusions here].
--
It takes two to lie, Marge. One to lie, and one to listen. |
|
 signmeuptooLove those still alivePremium
join:2001-11-22
NanoParticle
kudos:4 | I agree, highly improper. If scientific workers did things like that, they'd get fired. |
|
AthlGrondPremium,MVM
join:2002-04-25
Aurora, CO Reviews:
·Comcast
| reply to knightry
said by knightry:My point is that the page shouldn't have been included before they had any numbers. Leave it out of the report for now, include it once you have the data. It's like publishing a researching paper and leaving the Results Conclusion section as [insert results and conclusions here]. They use an automated system of compiling reliability reports so that they don't have to update their reviews later when the information becomes available. I agree that they have a clumsy way of presenting the lack of information.
Since the reliability information isn't the primary reason people are reading a review of a new hard drive, it could hardly be likened to the main conclusions of a research paper. My analogy would be that it's like a computer program where there is a menu option that doesn't work until they have released the first (or second, or...) update for the software.
They added that section to their reviews after the IBM Death Desk Star fiasco, and I don't think that they've updated the way it works since then.
--
"You are technically correct. The best kind of correct." -Bureaucrat 1.0 |
|
 CylonRedPremium,MVM
join:2000-07-06
Bloom County | reply to signmeuptoo
said by signmeuptoo:I agree, highly improper. If scientific workers did things like that, they'd get fired. But then we are not talking about scientific web site and probably makes it easier to maintain as AthlGrond alludes to I think. |
|
 KonceptzIntel
join:2001-12-22
Chesterfield, VA | reply to AthlGrond
I'll buy two of these before I buy two solid state drives for a raid 0. |
|
 Anonymous_AnonymousPremium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
kudos:2
·RoadRunner Cable
·Comcast
 ·Time Warner VOIP
1 edit | reply to The Flash
said by The Flash:For 300 bucks, I'd rather go for capacity than speed. it would be sweet in side an PS3 
there would be less LAGS with GTA
--
space bar is broken |
|
KearnstdElf WizardPremium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ | reply to AthlGrond
laptop too, unless that would burn it up |
|
 MchartFirst There.
join:2004-01-21
Gurnee, IL | reply to AthlGrond
I'd still purchase a larger capacity 7200rpm seagate with perpendicular recording, over these. There is little difference in terms of real-world noticeable performance, they are much cheaper, and you get a lot more storage.
--
"You figured it out. All new CPU's are nothing but overclocked Pentium 1's with a few bells and whistles added, ask any ol timer whose been around." |
|
