<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>P2P Interference From Cogeco in Cogeco</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20366954</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 23:32:44 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 23:32:44 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>P2P Interference From Cogeco</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20366954</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Vuze Study Points To P2P Interference From Cogeco<br>Full story @ &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/2855/125/" >www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/2855/125/</A><br><br>"Canada's Cogeco, which offers service in Quebec and Ontario, has a reset rate far higher than any other Canadian provider (indeed higher than anyone other than Comcast).  None of the major Canadian providers fare particularly well (Rogers, Telus, Shaw, Videotron all rank among the top 68 of 108 providers), however, the Cogeco certainly captured Vuze's attention."<br><br>" If it turns out that the company is actively interfering with network traffic, the CRTC may find itself dealing with another complaint before too long."]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20366954</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:22:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
