Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T Developing New Web Browser » this is innovation?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Next thing you know »
« How long til?  
AuthorAll Replies


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:
·Charter Pipeline
·AT&T Southwest

reply to benyto
Re: this is innovation?

i disagree.

imagine the chaos of firefox being installed by default on all new dsl or cable installs. no doubt it will also cause problem with the integration of ie with xp and vista...

not to mention the ill feelings people have toward AT&T. they could at least not be so obnoxious and arrogant about their ambitions. do one of those stupid toolbar search things first. see how it works. THEN attempt a new browser.


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
I guess Fedora Core would be out of the question for AT&T as well.
--
Canada = Hollywood North


benyto
Premium
join:2000-07-09
Chico, CA

reply to morbo
said by morbo See Profile :

i disagree.

imagine the chaos of firefox being installed by default on all new dsl or cable installs.
An ISP providing/installing a branded browser is not a new thing. Why should this be any different.


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:
there's a difference between installing a new browser over "branding" IE, as is usually the case.


benyto
Premium
join:2000-07-09
Chico, CA

I'm curious what you think the problems will be, and why those problems would stop AT&T from installing their browser as a default. You make some claim about integration problems with XP and Vista. Surely many people use Firefox, Opera, or other non-Microsoft browsers on those platforms. What show-stopping integration problems do you foresee that would stop AT&T from doing such a thing?

For what it's worth I don't use Windows. I don't know of the existence or absence of such problems. I'm not trying to bait you in to anything here. I'm honestly curious if you know of something that would make this a headache that isn't worthwhile for AT&T to try. It is not something I would put past them.
Forums » AT&T Developing New Web BrowserNext thing you know »
« How long til?  


Thursday, 03-Dec 15:18:19 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [129] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [103] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [76] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [48] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [47] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Warrior tank seem underpowered these days [World of Warcraft]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Linux is terrorist - according to MS... [All Things Unix]
· [TWC] Audio/Video outage in Brooklyn [Time Warner Cable TV/Voice]
· Microsoft actively urges IE 6 users to upgrade [Security]
· Many Sites Unreachable [Rogers]
· [Speed] Speedtest.net /higher/ than all others? [Comcast HSI]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· ICC Strats??? [World of Warcraft]