site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
88
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

mikenolan7
Premium
join:2005-06-07
Torrance, CA

ISP User Privacy

What is important is that everyone follows the laws. If this lady broke the law, and the prosecution follows the law and convicts her, then too bad for her. Forcing the prosecution to get the correct warrant to get information from the ISP is a good outcome. We can't expect to regain some privacy by cheering for guilty parties to get off scot free by hiding behind privacy laws. If the prosecution is politically motivated, that is another problem, not a privacy issue.

Anyone surprised by a state run by the mafia having strong privacy laws? Just kidding. What exitcha from?

SilverSurfer1

join:2007-08-19

said by mikenolan7:

We can't expect to regain some privacy by cheering for guilty parties to get off scot free by hiding behind privacy laws.
I didn't see anyone cheering for a "guilty" party. If she is guilty, then she is guilty. That is to be decided by a jury, not a court of public opinon. But let's have all parties involved jumping through the same legal hoops when it comes to handing over the identities associated with IP addresses. Get the correct warrant, don't just expect it to be handed over to quell personal outrage.


fatness
subtle
Janitor
join:2000-11-17
fishing
kudos:13
Host:
Bright House Netwo..
Earthlink DSL
TekSavvy
Forum Feature Requ..
Need Site Help

reply to mikenolan7

said by mikenolan7:

We can't expect to regain some privacy by cheering for guilty parties to get off scot free by hiding behind privacy laws.
Did they have the trial already and find her guilty?
--
Female monkeys often utter loud, distinctive calls before, during or after sex..

Tuesday, 29-May 15:18:38 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics